From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28845 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2007 19:49:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 28799 invoked by uid 48); 23 Apr 2007 19:49:26 -0000 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070423194926.28798.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/29786] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] Initialization of overlapping variables: Not implemented In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg01709.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #9 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-23 20:49 ------- I'm changing the name of this bug to make it a lot easier to find, now that we know what the actual problem is. Also, PR #31672 contains an excellent testcase for this, which I'll quote here: ---------------------------------------------- function d1mach(i) implicit none double precision d1mach,dmach(5) integer i,large(4),small(4) equivalence ( dmach(1), small(1) ) equivalence ( dmach(2), large(1) ) data small(1),small(2) / 0, 1048576/ data large(1),large(2) /-1,2146435071/ d1mach = 0.0d0 end function d1mach ---------------------------------------------- -- brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] |[4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] |rejects equivalence |Initialization of | |overlapping variables: Not | |implemented http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29786