[Bug target/10589] For Hitachi SH target, GCC craches when both -fomit-frame-pointer and -mdalign options are specified

[Bug target/10589] For Hitachi SH target, GCC craches when both -fomit-frame-pointer and -mdalign options are specified

[kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #7 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-04-27 22:36 -------
The testcase fails with 3.4.6, but doesn't fail with 4.0 and later
compilers.  So I'd like to close this PR as WONTFIX because 3.4 was
frozen.


-- 

kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
      Known to fail|                            |3.4.6
      Known to work|                            |4.0.4 4.1.2 4.2.0 4.3.0
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10589

[Bug target/10589] For Hitachi SH target, GCC craches when both -fomit-frame-pointer and -mdalign options are specified

[dank at kegel dot com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10589



------- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com  2003-09-15 17:41 -------
I've prepared a patch to add a testcase for this PR to the testsuite; see
http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/current/patches/gcc-3.3.1/pr10589-1-test.patch
I'll submit it to gcc-patches in a couple days if nobody squawks.

[Bug target/10589] For Hitachi SH target, GCC craches when both -fomit-frame-pointer and -mdalign options are specified

[dank at kegel dot com]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10589


dank at kegel dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dank at kegel dot com


------- Additional Comments From dank at kegel dot com  2003-09-14 17:58 -------
The testcase fails neither in gcc-3.0.2 as patched here in 2001,
nor in gcc-2.95 as supplied by Montavista in 2001,
so is it fair to say this is a regression?

[Bug target/10589] For Hitachi SH target, GCC craches when both -fomit-frame-pointer and -mdalign options are specified

[kazu at cs dot umass dot edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10589



------- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu  2003-07-15 17:02 -------
Here is an even smaller testcase.

int
foo (int a, int b)
{
  return a / b;
}

[Bug target/10589] For Hitachi SH target, GCC craches when both -fomit-frame-pointer and -mdalign options are specified

[pinskia@physics.uc.edu]

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10589


pinskia@physics.uc.edu changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-05-26 14:09:40
               date|                            |


------- Additional Comments From pinskia@physics.uc.edu  2003-05-26 14:09 -------
See Dara's comment.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.