From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11426 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2007 00:34:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 11377 invoked by uid 48); 28 Apr 2007 00:34:28 -0000 Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 00:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070428003428.11376.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/31319] Make big alignment for structs/arrays configurable In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg02168.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-28 01:34 ------- > BTW I think I see a bug created by this change: with -Os x86_86 ABI will be > violated - arrays larger than 16 bytes will still be aligned only to 4 bytes > because if's are in wrong order. shouldn't they be swapped? There is no return for the non x86-64 "if" so no there is no violation. Closing as fixed. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31319