public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug rtl-optimization/31799]  New: Failed to optimize out test instruction
@ 2007-05-03 14:21 hjl at lucon dot org
  2007-05-03 16:08 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2007-05-03 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

For

void
foo (int x, int *y, int *z)
{
  *z = ++x;
  if (x != 0)
  *y = 1;
}

gcc 4.3 generates

foo:
.LFB2:
        addl    $1, %edi
        testl   %edi, %edi
        movl    %edi, (%rdx)
        je      .L3
        movl    $1, (%rsi)
.L3:
        rep ; ret

But "testl   %edi, %edi" isn't needed since "addl    $1, %edi" sets proper
FLAGS_REG.


-- 
           Summary: Failed to optimize out test instruction
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: rtl-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] Failed to optimize out test instruction
  2007-05-03 14:21 [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] New: Failed to optimize out test instruction hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2007-05-03 16:08 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
  2007-05-03 16:22 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2007-05-03 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2007-05-03 17:08 -------
(In reply to comment #0)

> foo:
>         addl    $1, %edi
>         testl   %edi, %edi
>         movl    %edi, (%rdx)
>         je      .L3
>         movl    $1, (%rsi)
> .L3:
>         rep ; ret

This is just an unfortunate corner case. During combine phase we get:

(insn 10 6 11 2 (parallel [
            (set (reg/v:SI 58 [ x.27 ])
                (plus:SI (reg/v:SI 59 [ x ])
                    (const_int 1 [0x1])))
            (clobber (reg:CC 17 flags))
        ]) 210 {*addsi_1} (insn_list:REG_DEP_TRUE 3 (nil))
    (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/v:SI 59 [ x ])
        (expr_list:REG_UNUSED (reg:CC 17 flags)
            (nil))))

(insn 11 10 13 2 (set (mem:SI (reg/v/f:DI 61 [ z ]) [2 S4 A32])
        (reg/v:SI 58 [ x.27 ])) 40 {*movsi_1} (insn_list:REG_DEP_TRUE 5
(insn_list:REG_DEP_TRUE 10 (nil)))
    (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/v/f:DI 61 [ z ])
        (nil)))

(insn 13 11 14 2 (set (reg:CCZ 17 flags)
        (compare:CCZ (reg/v:SI 58 [ x.27 ])
            (const_int -1 [0xffffffffffffffff]))) 5 {*cmpsi_1_insn} (nil)
    (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/v:SI 58 [ x.27 ])
        (nil)))


It looks that insn 10 and insn 13 don't combine into flags setting insn due to
insn 11 interfering in some way. If the code is changed to:

void
foo (int x, int *y, int *z)
{
  if (++x != 0)
    *y = 1;
  *z = x;
}

then gcc generates expected asm without test insn.


-- 

ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2007-05-03 17:08:39
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] Failed to optimize out test instruction
  2007-05-03 14:21 [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] New: Failed to optimize out test instruction hjl at lucon dot org
  2007-05-03 16:08 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2007-05-03 16:22 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
  2007-05-05  1:31 ` hjl at lucon dot org
  2007-05-05 17:49 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2007-05-03 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2007-05-03 17:22 -------
Ah, for some reason insn 13 does not have the insn link pointing to insn 10.
Probably dataflow should/could fix this?


-- 

ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ubizjak at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] Failed to optimize out test instruction
  2007-05-03 14:21 [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] New: Failed to optimize out test instruction hjl at lucon dot org
  2007-05-03 16:08 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
  2007-05-03 16:22 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2007-05-05  1:31 ` hjl at lucon dot org
  2007-05-05 17:49 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: hjl at lucon dot org @ 2007-05-05  1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from hjl at lucon dot org  2007-05-05 02:31 -------
The problem may be patterns like

 [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=r,rm,r")
        (plus:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "%0,0,r")
                 (match_operand:SI 2 "general_operand" "rmni,rni,lni")))
   (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))]

What if we replace (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG)) with something more
reasonable like

(set (reg FLAGS_REG)
        (compare
          (plus:SI (match_dup 1) (match_dup 2))
          (const_int 0)))


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] Failed to optimize out test instruction
  2007-05-03 14:21 [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] New: Failed to optimize out test instruction hjl at lucon dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-05-05  1:31 ` hjl at lucon dot org
@ 2007-05-05 17:49 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2007-05-05 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2007-05-05 18:49 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> The problem may be patterns like

No, the patterns are OK. Combine pass merges these patterns without problems.
But without links, combine doesn't even try to merge them.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] Failed to optimize out test instruction
       [not found] <bug-31799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-11-17 14:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-11-17 14:05 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2020-11-17 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799

H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
   Target Milestone|---                         |8.0

--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
Fixed in GCC 8.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] Failed to optimize out test instruction
       [not found] <bug-31799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-11-17 13:57 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
@ 2020-11-17 14:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-11-17 14:05 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-17 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799

--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu <hjl@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7f87b4ef2323769bd71f7ccea2aa6017a7376f76

commit r11-5090-g7f87b4ef2323769bd71f7ccea2aa6017a7376f76
Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue Nov 17 06:01:41 2020 -0800

    x86: Add a testcase for PR target/31799

    Add a testcase for PR target/31799 which was fixed by

    commit 4f0473fe89e68bf7c09542ee5c3684da25a5b435
    Author: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
    Date:   Fri May 12 21:04:05 2017 +0200

        compare-elim.c (try_eliminate_compare): Canonicalize operation with
embedded compare to [(set (reg:CCM) (compare:CCM...

                * compare-elim.c (try_eliminate_compare): Canonicalize
                operation with embedded compare to
                [(set (reg:CCM) (compare:CCM (operation) (immediate)))
                 (set (reg) (operation)].

                * config/i386/i386.c (TARGET_FLAGS_REGNUM): New define.

    in GCC 8.

            PR target/31799
            * gcc.target/i386/pr31799.c: New test.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] Failed to optimize out test instruction
       [not found] <bug-31799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2020-11-17 10:06 ` gabravier at gmail dot com
@ 2020-11-17 13:57 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  2020-11-17 14:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
  2020-11-17 14:05 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: hjl.tools at gmail dot com @ 2020-11-17 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799

--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
It is fixed by r8-647.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] Failed to optimize out test instruction
       [not found] <bug-31799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2020-08-03 14:00 ` david.bolvansky at gmail dot com
  2020-08-03 14:01 ` david.bolvansky at gmail dot com
@ 2020-11-17 10:06 ` gabravier at gmail dot com
  2020-11-17 13:57 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: gabravier at gmail dot com @ 2020-11-17 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799

Gabriel Ravier <gabravier at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |gabravier at gmail dot com

--- Comment #7 from Gabriel Ravier <gabravier at gmail dot com> ---
Seems to now be fixed, I don't see this happening on GCC trunk at the very
least.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] Failed to optimize out test instruction
       [not found] <bug-31799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2020-08-03 14:00 ` david.bolvansky at gmail dot com
@ 2020-08-03 14:01 ` david.bolvansky at gmail dot com
  2020-11-17 10:06 ` gabravier at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: david.bolvansky at gmail dot com @ 2020-08-03 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799

--- Comment #6 from Dávid Bolvanský <david.bolvansky at gmail dot com> ---
^ Posted by mistake. Sorry.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] Failed to optimize out test instruction
       [not found] <bug-31799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-08-03 14:00 ` david.bolvansky at gmail dot com
  2020-08-03 14:01 ` david.bolvansky at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: david.bolvansky at gmail dot com @ 2020-08-03 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799

Dávid Bolvanský <david.bolvansky at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |david.bolvansky at gmail dot com

--- Comment #5 from Dávid Bolvanský <david.bolvansky at gmail dot com> ---
Codegen:
https://godbolt.org/z/7EvYj9

foo:
        movabs  rdx, -6148914691236517205
        mov     rax, rdi
        mul     rdx
        mov     rax, rdx
        and     rdx, -2
        shr     rax
        add     rdx, rax
        xor     eax, eax
        cmp     rdi, rdx
        setnb   al
        ret
N:
        .quad   3

Can be optimized to return true

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-17 14:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-05-03 14:21 [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] New: Failed to optimize out test instruction hjl at lucon dot org
2007-05-03 16:08 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/31799] " ubizjak at gmail dot com
2007-05-03 16:22 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2007-05-05  1:31 ` hjl at lucon dot org
2007-05-05 17:49 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
     [not found] <bug-31799-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-08-03 14:00 ` david.bolvansky at gmail dot com
2020-08-03 14:01 ` david.bolvansky at gmail dot com
2020-11-17 10:06 ` gabravier at gmail dot com
2020-11-17 13:57 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2020-11-17 14:05 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-11-17 14:05 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).