From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19399 invoked by alias); 9 May 2007 23:01:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 19349 invoked by uid 48); 9 May 2007 23:00:48 -0000 Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 23:01:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070509230048.19348.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c/31870] Failure to diagnose taking address of register variable In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "neil at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00719.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from neil at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-10 00:00 ------- Agreed it's minor; I think I flagged the PR that way. I'm not sure but I suspect it indicates that the pointer decay is not happening. If so and you were using GCC to do source code analysis, you would have an incorrect type in the expression tree. Which may not be a big deal. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31870