From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32153 invoked by alias); 22 May 2007 12:45:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 32109 invoked by uid 48); 22 May 2007 12:45:29 -0000 Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 12:45:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070522124529.32108.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/31298] Uninitialized variable in f951 (in read_module) In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg01850.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #7 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-22 13:45 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Tobias, what is the current status on that bug? The attached patch is ok, except it fixes only part of the problem. I got stuck at: operator(+) => operator(.op.) That is: importing an user operator as intrinsic operator. I have several versions of patches here, which all don't work. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31298