From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27372 invoked by alias); 31 May 2007 08:32:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 27331 invoked by uid 48); 31 May 2007 08:32:48 -0000 Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 08:32:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070531083248.27330.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/20373] INTRINSIC symbols can be given the wrong type In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg02795.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #11 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-31 08:32 ------- Other compilers give only a warning. NAG f95 does for: integer :: len intrinsic len Warning: yy.f90, line 9: Intrinsic function LEN explicitly typed and for real :: len intrinsic len Warning: yy.f90, line 9: Type declaration for generic intrinsic LEN ignored I think it makes sense to have the first warning always shown. For the second one, maybe it should only be shown using some -W* ? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20373