From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8814 invoked by alias); 1 Jun 2007 07:30:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 8655 invoked by uid 48); 1 Jun 2007 07:29:55 -0000 Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 07:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070601072955.8654.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/26449] [4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE in loop invariant motion In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00017.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #13 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2007-06-01 07:29 ------- (In reply to comment #11) > New test (from PR32123): > > Standalone testcase, compile with -O2 -msse2 -mtune=k8: Hm, this bug was misteriously fixed. It was manifested as gcc.target/i386/sse2-vec-6.c failure in [1] and this failure is not present anymore in [2]: [1]: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-05/msg01375.html [2]: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-05/msg01530.html I'm closing it as WORKSFORME due to these misteries. The fix is IMO still wrong. -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |WORKSFORME http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26449