public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/32196]  New: Upgrading GNU/Linux to libc6_2.6~20070518-2 fails gfortran.dg/secnds.f
@ 2007-06-03 12:30 rob1weld at aol dot com
  2007-06-03 13:07 ` [Bug fortran/32196] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rob1weld at aol dot com @ 2007-06-03 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

Please read first portion of http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32193
to see the where and how of obtaining and installing new libc6, then come back
here.

After upgrading my library I did a diff of the "make -i check" test results of
the build before I upgraded and after I upgraded. It was identical except for
this:

# diff -Naur ../gcc-4_3-build-libc6_2.3.6/summary
../gcc-4_3-build-libc6_2.6/summary

--- ../gcc-4_3-build-libc6_2.3.6/summary    2007-06-02 15:10:51.000000000 -0700
+++ ../gcc-4_3-build-libc6_2.6/summary    2007-06-03 04:40:17.000000000 -0700
@@ -119,11 +119,12 @@
 FAIL: gfortran.dg/open_errors.f90  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions  execution test
 FAIL: gfortran.dg/open_errors.f90  -O3 -g  execution test
 FAIL: gfortran.dg/open_errors.f90  -Os  execution test
+FAIL: gfortran.dg/secnds.f  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  execution test

                === gfortran Summary ===

-# of expected passes           18236
-# of unexpected failures       16
+# of expected passes           18235
+# of unexpected failures       17
 # of expected failures         8
 # of unsupported tests         16
 /opt/gcc-4_3-build/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran  version 4.3.0
20070602 (experimental)


The "gfortran.dg/secnds.f" test did not fail prior to my upgrade.


-- 
           Summary: Upgrading GNU/Linux to libc6_2.6~20070518-2 fails
                    gfortran.dg/secnds.f
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
 GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32196


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/32196] Upgrading GNU/Linux to libc6_2.6~20070518-2 fails gfortran.dg/secnds.f
  2007-06-03 12:30 [Bug fortran/32196] New: Upgrading GNU/Linux to libc6_2.6~20070518-2 fails gfortran.dg/secnds.f rob1weld at aol dot com
@ 2007-06-03 13:07 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
  2007-06-03 14:14 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2007-06-03 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2007-06-03 13:07 -------
> The "gfortran.dg/secnds.f" test did not fail prior to my upgrade.

You were a lucky guy!-) see PR32057 for more details


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32196


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/32196] Upgrading GNU/Linux to libc6_2.6~20070518-2 fails gfortran.dg/secnds.f
  2007-06-03 12:30 [Bug fortran/32196] New: Upgrading GNU/Linux to libc6_2.6~20070518-2 fails gfortran.dg/secnds.f rob1weld at aol dot com
  2007-06-03 13:07 ` [Bug fortran/32196] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2007-06-03 14:14 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-06-03 17:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-06-05 18:54 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-03 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-06-03 14:14 -------
open_errors.f90 is testing for some OS dependent text in error messages.  If
you could extract that from the testsuite, compile it, and run it, you may see
that it works  fine, but some text has changed.  I would very much appreciate
if you could post the output from that program.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32196


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/32196] Upgrading GNU/Linux to libc6_2.6~20070518-2 fails gfortran.dg/secnds.f
  2007-06-03 12:30 [Bug fortran/32196] New: Upgrading GNU/Linux to libc6_2.6~20070518-2 fails gfortran.dg/secnds.f rob1weld at aol dot com
  2007-06-03 13:07 ` [Bug fortran/32196] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
  2007-06-03 14:14 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-06-03 17:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-06-05 18:54 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-03 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-06-03 17:07 -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 32057 ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32196


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/32196] Upgrading GNU/Linux to libc6_2.6~20070518-2 fails gfortran.dg/secnds.f
  2007-06-03 12:30 [Bug fortran/32196] New: Upgrading GNU/Linux to libc6_2.6~20070518-2 fails gfortran.dg/secnds.f rob1weld at aol dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-06-03 17:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-06-05 18:54 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rob1weld at aol dot com @ 2007-06-05 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com  2007-06-05 18:54 -------
>> jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org
>> open_errors.f90 is testing for some OS dependent text in error messages. ...
>> I would very much appreciate if you could post the output from that program.

I'd be glad to help but I am not at that stage of a build at this moment and
don't have a working fortran compiler to use.

Since your post subject does not match the title of this bug report subject
(but matches a word in the post) _and_ since this is marked a dupe I don't know
that a lot of people will read your request.


If it is "OS dependent text in error messages" that you want then why not alter
the expect script to print a WARNING: after the test that shows the output that
was obtained.

That way people do not have to read this post, only run the tests and submit
the results - which they must be doing or you would not be getting the errors.

You can remove the warning in a week when you have all your answers.

I would only be able to give you the answer for a small number of OS's in any
event. Thanks for working on the "open_errors.f90" bug - it needs fixing also.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32196


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-06-05 18:54 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-06-03 12:30 [Bug fortran/32196] New: Upgrading GNU/Linux to libc6_2.6~20070518-2 fails gfortran.dg/secnds.f rob1weld at aol dot com
2007-06-03 13:07 ` [Bug fortran/32196] " dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2007-06-03 14:14 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-03 17:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-05 18:54 ` rob1weld at aol dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).