public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "waldemar dot rachwal at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/31960] Premature hiding of symbols makes a copy constructor shooting at its own foot Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 09:44:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20070606094408.5236.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-31960-14556@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #3 from waldemar dot rachwal at gmail dot com 2007-06-06 09:44 ------- [3 weeks went by, but i've not forgotten about my bug report ;] as about the last comment (#2) I can't fully agree. -Winit-self works, but only in case of builtin scalar data types. For objects the compiler is almost quiet. Please don't misunderstand me: I don't really want any options to signal a warning on self-initializers (more options, much headache). I really expect well defined, desirable semantics for such constructs because there are cases they are very helpful. Of course, if the current standard says nothing about this or leave up to implementors, and we want to have G++ semantics here defined, there is a room for some options in the meantime until the standard becomes definite. Please note that scripting languages are well defined here. Below is a simple Perl code (strictness checks if vars are defined, while -w option add extra warning level). Regards, WR. $ perl -Mstrict -e 'my $z = 1; my $z = $z + 1; print "$z\n"' 2 $ perl -w -Mstrict -e 'my $z = 1; my $z = $z + 1; print "$z\n"' "my" variable $z masks earlier declaration in same scope at -e line 1. 2 -- waldemar dot rachwal at gmail dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |waldemar dot rachwal at | |gmail dot com Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31960
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-06 9:44 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2007-05-16 17:04 [Bug c++/31960] New: " waldemar dot rachwal at gmail dot com 2007-05-16 18:48 ` [Bug c++/31960] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-17 14:55 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2007-06-06 9:44 ` waldemar dot rachwal at gmail dot com [this message] 2007-06-06 21:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20070606094408.5236.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).