------- Comment #28 from pluto at agmk dot net  2007-06-06 10:08 -------
(In reply to comment #27)

> It is not like GCC is a closed source program either,
> you can try to make a fix for the issue too.

Andrew, real world is not so simple ;)

some time ago Manuel López-Ibáñez helps me create official patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302#c22

patch was submitted:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg01347.html

added to tracker:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302#c23

and pinged:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00604.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00110.html

c.a. 3 months and no effects for tested trivial patch.
no accecpt, no reject, no commit, no fun.
in current situation i feel no reason to working
on another patch while the GCC-Team redirect external
patches to /dev/null.

moreover, gcc lists are full of patch-ping^N-noeffects.
i think people are not motivated to cooperate with GCC-Team.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29365