From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18877 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2007 10:09:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 18827 invoked by uid 48); 6 Jun 2007 10:08:51 -0000 Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070606100851.18826.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/29365] Unnecessary anonymous namespace warnings In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pluto at agmk dot net" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00375.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #28 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-06-06 10:08 ------- (In reply to comment #27) > It is not like GCC is a closed source program either, > you can try to make a fix for the issue too. Andrew, real world is not so simple ;) some time ago Manuel López-Ibáñez helps me create official patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302#c22 patch was submitted: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg01347.html added to tracker: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302#c23 and pinged: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00604.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-05/msg00110.html c.a. 3 months and no effects for tested trivial patch. no accecpt, no reject, no commit, no fun. in current situation i feel no reason to working on another patch while the GCC-Team redirect external patches to /dev/null. moreover, gcc lists are full of patch-ping^N-noeffects. i think people are not motivated to cooperate with GCC-Team. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29365