From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26051 invoked by alias); 11 Jun 2007 16:06:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 26022 invoked by uid 48); 11 Jun 2007 16:06:44 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070611160644.26021.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/32285] [4.1 Regression] Miscompilation with pure _Complex returning call inside another fn's argument list In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jconner at apple dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg00769.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from jconner at apple dot com 2007-06-11 16:06 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Looking at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-09/msg00951.html > I'm slightly worried about backporting this to gcc-4_1-branch though. > Has that been resolved? I recall being told that the problem was most likely the benchmarks, and that I shouldn't worry about it. Unfortunately, it must have been off-list, because I can't find anything in the email archives. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32285