public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/32315] New: DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing @ 2007-06-13 6:25 burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-13 6:46 ` [Bug fortran/32315] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (6 more replies) 0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-13 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs Found at: http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/34f509b6b4241c6d/ program chkdata character(len=20), dimension(4) :: string data ( string(i) ,i=1,5 ) / & 'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E' / write(*,*) string end program chkdata gfortran gives no warning/error whereas NAG f95 rejects it with: Error line 5: First subscript (5) is greater than upper bound (4) for array STRING and g95 rejects it with: Error: Out of bounds array reference at (1) and sunf95 with: ERROR: The upper bound for dimension 1 of the array STRING is out of range. (ifort does the same as gfortran: It accepts it.) -- Summary: DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid, diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32315 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/32315] DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing 2007-06-13 6:25 [Bug fortran/32315] New: DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-13 6:46 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-13 20:51 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (5 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-13 6:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-13 06:46 ------- Dump shows: static char string[4][1:20] = {"A ", "B ", "C ", "D ", "E " } Check should probably be in resolve.c's check_data_variable. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to fail| |4.1.3 4.2.0 4.3.0 Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32315 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/32315] DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing 2007-06-13 6:25 [Bug fortran/32315] New: DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-13 6:46 ` [Bug fortran/32315] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-13 20:51 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-14 6:43 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (4 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-13 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |27766 nThis| | Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-06-13 20:51:44 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32315 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/32315] DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing 2007-06-13 6:25 [Bug fortran/32315] New: DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-13 6:46 ` [Bug fortran/32315] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-13 20:51 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-14 6:43 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-20 11:56 ` [Bug fortran/32315] DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77] tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-14 6:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-14 06:43 ------- Using data ( string(i) ,i=-3,1 ) / & 'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E' / gives even an ICE. -- burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |ice-on-invalid-code http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32315 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/32315] DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77] 2007-06-13 6:25 [Bug fortran/32315] New: DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2007-06-14 6:43 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-01-20 11:56 ` tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 9:37 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-01-20 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #3 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-20 10:48 ------- This is a regression vs. g77: $ cat foo.f program chkdata character*20 string(4) data ( string(i) ,i=1,5 ) /'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E' / write(*,*) string end $ g77 foo.f foo.f: In program `chkdata': foo.f:3: data ( string(i) ,i=1,5 ) /'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E' / ^ Attempt to specify second initial value for `string' at (^) $ cat bar.f program chkdata character*20 string(4) data ( string(i) ,i=-3,1 ) /'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E' / write(*,*) string end $ g77 bar.f Array subscript #1 out of range for initialization of `string' in statement at (1) Array subscript #1 out of range for initialization of `string' in statement at (1) bar.f: In program `chkdata': bar.f:3: data ( string(i) ,i=-3,1 ) /'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E' / ^ Attempt to specify second initial value for element of `string' at (^) Array subscript #1 out of range for initialization of `string' in statement at (1) bar.f:3: data ( string(i) ,i=-3,1 ) /'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E' / ^ Attempt to specify second initial value for element of `string' at (^) Array subscript #1 out of range for initialization of `string' in statement at (1) bar.f:3: data ( string(i) ,i=-3,1 ) /'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E' / ^ Attempt to specify second initial value for element of `string' at (^) bar.f:3: data ( string(i) ,i=-3,1 ) /'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E' / ^ Attempt to specify second initial value for element of `string' at (^) $ -- tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot | |org Summary|DATA with implied-do: Bounds|DATA with implied-do: Bounds |checks missing |checks missing [regression | |vs. g77] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32315 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/32315] DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77] 2007-06-13 6:25 [Bug fortran/32315] New: DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2008-01-20 11:56 ` [Bug fortran/32315] DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77] tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-05 9:37 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 11:18 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 13:07 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-05 9:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 09:36 ------- I have just posted a patch, so I had better take the PR on! http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2008-02/msg00027.html Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2007-06-13 20:51:44 |2008-02-05 09:36:48 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32315 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/32315] DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77] 2007-06-13 6:25 [Bug fortran/32315] New: DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2008-02-05 9:37 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-05 11:18 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 13:07 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-05 11:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 11:17 ------- Subject: Bug 32315 Author: pault Date: Tue Feb 5 11:16:33 2008 New Revision: 132113 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132113 Log: 2008-02-05 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org> PR fortran/32315 * data.c (gfc_assign_data_value): Add bounds check for array references. 2008-02-05 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org> PR fortran/32315 * gfortran.dg/data_bounds_1.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/data_bounds_1.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/data.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32315 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/32315] DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77] 2007-06-13 6:25 [Bug fortran/32315] New: DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2008-02-05 11:18 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-05 13:07 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-05 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 13:06 ------- Fixed on trunk Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32315 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-05 13:07 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2007-06-13 6:25 [Bug fortran/32315] New: DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-13 6:46 ` [Bug fortran/32315] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-13 20:51 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-14 6:43 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-20 11:56 ` [Bug fortran/32315] DATA with implied-do: Bounds checks missing [regression vs. g77] tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 9:37 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 11:18 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-05 13:07 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).