public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/20863] Pointer problems in PURE procedures
[not found] <bug-20863-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2006-10-12 0:07 ` brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-16 11:07 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-12 0:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 00:07 -------
On a similar note, the following is legal code for which an error is
incorrectly reported:
>> $ cat pr20863a.f90
>> PURE FUNCTION give_next(i)
>> TYPE node_type
>> sequence
>> TYPE(node_type), POINTER :: next
>> END TYPE
>> TYPE(node_type), POINTER :: node
>> TYPE(node_type), target :: t
>> integer, intent(in) :: i
>> node%next = t
>> END FUNCTION
>>
>> THOMASP@PC-THOMAS-P /cygdrive/d/svn/prs
>> $ /irun/bin/gfortran -c pr20863a.f90
>> In file pr20863a.f90:9
>>
>> node%next = t
>> 1
>> Error: Right side of assignment at (1) is a derived type containing a
>> POINTER in a PURE procedure
See discussion here for details:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2006-10/msg00340.html
--
brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |brooks at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Summary|Pointer of host-associated |Pointer problems in PURE
|type in PURE procedure |procedures
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20863
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/20863] Pointer problems in PURE procedures
[not found] <bug-20863-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-10-12 0:07 ` [Bug fortran/20863] Pointer problems in PURE procedures brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-06-16 11:07 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-16 16:10 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-16 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-16 11:07 -------
This has been on the books too long - I was hoping that this would be dealt
with as a tyro job:)
.....and, yes, a fix is on the way!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2006-03-05 03:47:10 |2007-06-16 11:07:46
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20863
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/20863] Pointer problems in PURE procedures
[not found] <bug-20863-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-10-12 0:07 ` [Bug fortran/20863] Pointer problems in PURE procedures brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-16 11:07 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-06-16 16:10 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2007-06-18 23:04 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: patchapp at dberlin dot org @ 2007-06-16 16:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-06-16 16:10 -------
Subject: Bug number PR20863
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-06/msg01127.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20863
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/20863] Pointer problems in PURE procedures
[not found] <bug-20863-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-06-16 16:10 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
@ 2007-06-18 23:04 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-18 23:09 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-19 16:30 ` [Bug fortran/20863] [4.2 only] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-18 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-18 23:04 -------
Subject: Bug 20863
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jun 18 23:04:28 2007
New Revision: 125831
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=125831
Log:
2007-06-19 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/20863
PR fortran/20082
* resolve.c (resolve_code): Use gfc_impure_variable as a
condition for rejecting derived types with pointers, in pure
procedures.
(gfc_impure_variable): Add test for dummy arguments of pure
procedures; any for functions and INTENT_IN for subroutines.
PR fortran/32236
* data.c (gfc_assign_data_value): Change the ICE on an array
reference initializer not being an array into an error and
clear init to prevent a repetition of the error.
2007-06-19 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/20863
PR fortran/20082
* gfortran.dg/impure_assignment_2.f90 : New test.
PR fortran/32236
* gfortran.dg/data_initialized_2.f90 : New test.
* gfortran.dg/equiv_7.f90 : Test for endianess and call the
appropriate version of 'dmach'.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/data_initialized_2.f90
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/impure_assignment_2.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/data.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/equiv_7.f90
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20863
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/20863] Pointer problems in PURE procedures
[not found] <bug-20863-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2007-06-18 23:04 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-06-18 23:09 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-19 16:30 ` [Bug fortran/20863] [4.2 only] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-18 23:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-18 23:08 -------
Fixed on trunk
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20863
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/20863] [4.2 only] Pointer problems in PURE procedures
[not found] <bug-20863-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2007-06-18 23:09 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-06-19 16:30 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-19 16:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-19 16:30 -------
Tobias points out to me that this is not a regression - closed and out.
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20863
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-06-19 16:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-20863-6642@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2006-10-12 0:07 ` [Bug fortran/20863] Pointer problems in PURE procedures brooks at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-16 11:07 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-16 16:10 ` patchapp at dberlin dot org
2007-06-18 23:04 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-18 23:09 ` pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-19 16:30 ` [Bug fortran/20863] [4.2 only] " pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).