From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5964 invoked by alias); 18 Jun 2007 03:19:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 5564 invoked by uid 48); 18 Jun 2007 03:19:18 -0000 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 03:19:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070618031918.5563.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/32387] back port POINTER_PLUS to gcc-4.2.1 on an exceptional basis In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg01421.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-18 03:19 ------- First you are crazy even in suggesting a back port. 4.2.x is feature frozen. If you don't like that, use 4.3.0 (trunk) instead. Yes it might show up other bugs in other places but that is the reason why they are called latent bugs. Please stop reopening this. Pointer plus is too many changes to go on a release branch. I think you also need to learn a release cycle is. Please read http://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html . -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|c |tree-optimization Resolution| |WONTFIX http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32387