From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 717 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2007 08:02:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 32189 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2007 08:01:54 -0000 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070621080154.32188.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rguenther at suse dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg01860.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #21 from rguenther at suse dot de 2007-06-21 08:01 ------- Subject: Re: ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold On Thu, 20 Jun 2007, spop at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > ------- Comment #18 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 23:31 ------- > Subject: Re: ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with > --enable-checking=fold > > Hi, here is the final fix for the remaining cases, closing this PR. > Okay for trunk after bootntest on i686-linux with default languages > and --enable-checking=assert,fold,gc,misc,rtl,rtlflag,runtime,tree ? This doesn't look right - let me investigate. Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20623