From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13935 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2007 08:16:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 13409 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2007 08:16:23 -0000 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 08:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070621081623.13408.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "richard dot guenther at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg01862.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #22 from richard dot guenther at gmail dot com 2007-06-21 08:16 ------- Subject: Re: ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold On 6/21/07, Sebastian Pop wrote: > Hi, here is the final fix for the remaining cases, closing this PR. > Okay for trunk after bootntest on i686-linux with default languages > and --enable-checking=assert,fold,gc,misc,rtl,rtlflag,runtime,tree ? The fold_binary change looks unnecessary. The rest is ok. Thanks, Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20623