From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16331 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2007 14:39:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 16240 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2007 14:39:31 -0000 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:39:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070621143931.16239.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/31541] [4.3 Regression] cannot take address of bit field In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "hubicka at ucw dot cz" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg01927.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #9 from hubicka at ucw dot cz 2007-06-21 14:39 ------- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] cannot take address of bit field > > > ------- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 11:19 ------- > Ping? I tought the bug is long fixed by moving the folding from fold into Gimple fold_stmt. We probably should not emit frontend warnings/errors that late, I will check if I can get it done earlier at gimplification time. Otherwise Andrew's patch to avoid the folding for bit_field_type is probably way to go. Honza -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31541