public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/31541] [4.3 Regression] cannot take address of bit field
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:53:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070621145252.21376.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-31541-11706@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de  2007-06-21 14:52 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.3 Regression] cannot take address of
 bit field

On Thu, 21 Jun 2007, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:

> 
> 
> ------- Comment #9 from hubicka at ucw dot cz  2007-06-21 14:39 -------
> Subject: Re:  [4.3 Regression] cannot take address of bit field
> 
> > 
> > 
> > ------- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-06-21 11:19 -------
> > Ping?
> 
> I tought the bug is long fixed by moving the folding from fold into
> Gimple fold_stmt.  We probably should not emit frontend warnings/errors
> that late, I will check if I can get it done earlier at gimplification
> time.  Otherwise Andrew's patch to avoid the folding for bit_field_type
> is probably way to go.

The bug is still there and we fail to build the kernel because of it 
still.

Richard.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31541


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-06-21 14:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-11 20:21 [Bug c/31541] New: " malitzke at metronets dot com
2007-04-11 20:26 ` [Bug c/31541] " malitzke at metronets dot com
2007-04-11 20:43 ` [Bug middle-end/31541] [4.3 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-15  0:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-15  0:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-21 22:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-04-22  8:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-12 16:06 ` dcb314 at hotmail dot com
2007-06-21 11:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-21 14:39 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2007-06-21 14:53 ` rguenther at suse dot de [this message]
2007-06-21 21:13 ` malitzke at metronets dot com
2007-06-22  9:35 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2007-06-22  9:36 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2007-06-22  9:45 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2007-06-22 12:51 ` malitzke at metronets dot com
2007-06-22 23:59 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2007-06-23  8:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-23 11:58 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-23 15:39 ` malitzke at metronets dot com
2007-06-23 15:42 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2007-06-23 15:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070621145252.21376.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).