From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30409 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2007 05:06:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 30363 invoked by uid 48); 25 Jun 2007 05:06:48 -0000 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 05:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070625050648.30362.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "rob1weld at aol dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg02284.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #34 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-06-25 05:06 ------- (In reply to comment #33) > (In reply to comment #32) > > Everyone: Don't forget "df", it doesn't slow checking much. > > Compile + check time < 16 hours :) only: > > --enable-stage1-checking=assert,df,fold,gc,misc,rtl,rtlflag,runtime,tree > To avoid forgetting anything, try "yes,rtl,fold" as your checking options. Would that enable gcac. Is gcac less useful and very very slow. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20623