From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13164 invoked by alias); 25 Jun 2007 05:44:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 13114 invoked by uid 48); 25 Jun 2007 05:44:39 -0000 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 05:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070625054439.13113.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/20623] ICE: fold check: original tree changed by fold with --enable-checking=fold In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg02290.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #35 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-25 05:44 ------- (In reply to comment #34) > (In reply to comment #33) > > (In reply to comment #32) > > > Everyone: Don't forget "df", it doesn't slow checking much. > > > Compile + check time < 16 hours :) only: > > > --enable-stage1-checking=assert,df,fold,gc,misc,rtl,rtlflag,runtime,tree > > To avoid forgetting anything, try "yes,rtl,fold" as your checking options. > Would that enable gcac. Is gcac less useful and very very slow. The "yes" option does not invoke "gcac". It is equivalent to the default on mainline, as if you didn't specify any checking flags. Look in gcc/configure.ac and search for "gcac" or "rtlflag" and you'll see the shell code in question. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20623