From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7558 invoked by alias); 26 Jun 2007 14:53:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 7519 invoked by uid 48); 26 Jun 2007 14:53:25 -0000 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 14:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070626145325.7518.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/32492] [4.3 Regression] attribute always_inline -> sorry, unimplemented: recursive inlining In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-06/txt/msg02467.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-26 14:53 ------- I am going to change the component as middle-end while someone figures out if we want to promote in the front-ends or later on. I say we want to promote in front-ends rather than later on because we get more information about the how the arguments would look like (and we might lose some info otherwise). -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |blocker Component|c |middle-end http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32492