From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21661 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 2007 10:36:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 21470 invoked by uid 48); 3 Jul 2007 10:36:34 -0000 Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 10:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070703103634.21469.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/31688] Bogus "may be used uninitialized" warning In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg00284.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-03 10:36 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I don't know how one should properly handle these in the front end (without > unneeded initialization of variables), but I reopened the bug and moved it to > the Fortran front end. They need to be marked with TREE_NO_WARNING. I did that once, but never came close to submitting the patch. I'll take care of this. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-07-03 10:36:33 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31688