From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28383 invoked by alias); 3 Jul 2007 18:15:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 28227 invoked by uid 48); 3 Jul 2007 18:15:20 -0000 Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2007 18:15:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070703181520.28226.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/17088] poor fortran optimisation at -O2/3 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg00350.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #13 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2007-07-03 18:15 ------- looks like current mainline is much slower than ifort (300%) on this testcase (on core2). > ifort -xT -O2 test.f90 > ./a.out 0.000000000000000E+000 0.228014000000000 0.228014000000000 > gfortran -O3 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize -march=native test.f90 > ./a.out 0.00000000000000 0.684042000000000 0.280018000000000 0.584042000000000 vs 0.228014000000000 seconds -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17088