From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30127 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2007 08:50:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 30005 invoked by uid 48); 4 Jul 2007 08:50:13 -0000 Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2007 08:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070704085013.30004.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/31197] [4.2/4.3 regression] TRANSPOSE/RESHAPE and strings In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pault at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg00484.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #15 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-04 08:50 ------- > > > > > is this still correct ? > > Adding Paul, so he can see this question and hopefully answer affirmatively. > The patch was posted to the list 0615; whilst functional, in that it fixed the bugs, bootstrapped and regtested OK, it was not the whole job. The intention was to sort out some of the fundamental problems with characters and to get rid of some of the kludges in translation. The patch was also judged to be untimely relative to the 4.3 release schedule so I agreed to hold back. I am, in fact, working on it this week and hope to get it out of the door this weekend. I am contemplating breaking the patch up into stages, of which the fix to this PR would be one. What do you think? Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31197