public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/28904]  New: operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC
@ 2006-08-30 15:21 glibersat at linux62 dot org
  2006-08-31  2:41 ` [Bug target/28904] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 more replies)
  0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: glibersat at linux62 dot org @ 2006-08-30 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

When trying to build CrystalSpace3d, which is a very big application, on
GNU/Linux, I get errors like this :

{standard input}:1236795: Error: operand out of range (0x0000000000008220 is
not between 0xffffffffffff8000 and 0x0000000000007fff)
(repeated about 300 times)

The file, cs_pyth.cpp generates a huge .S (45Mb).

Every error refers to a "lwz" instruction :
        lwz 4,.LC42716-.LCTOC1(30)
        lwz 4,.LC42718-.LCTOC1(30)
        lwz 4,.LC42720-.LCTOC1(30)
        lwz 4,.LC42722-.LCTOC1(30)
        lwz 4,.LC42724-.LCTOC1(30)
        lwz 4,.LC42726-.LCTOC1(30)

=========

Here's what I'm using :
[sakura>glibersat::crystal]$ g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: powerpc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++,treelang --prefix=/usr
--enable-shared --with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib
--without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --enable-nls
--program-suffix=-4.1 --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu
--enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-mpfr --disable-softfloat
--enable-targets=powerpc-linux,powerpc64-linux --with-cpu=default32
--enable-checking=release powerpc-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.1.2 20060814 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-11)

=========

The complete command line is :
g++ -c -o ./out/linuxppc/debug/plugins/cscript/cspython/cs_pyth.o -I.
-I./include -I./include -pipe -Wall -Wno-unknown-pragmas -I/usr/local/include
-fno-exceptions -g3 -DCS_DEBUG -fPIC -I/usr/include/python2.3 -DSWIG_GLOBAL
-Wno-unused -Wno-uninitialized -fno-strict-aliasing 
./out/linuxppc/debug/plugins/cscript/cspython/cs_pyth.cpp

=========

I can't attach the .i file since it's really big. You can get it there :
http://glibersat.linux62.org/~glibersat/cs_pyth.ii

Thanks !


-- 
           Summary: operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: major
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: glibersat at linux62 dot org
 GCC build triplet: powerpc-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: powerpc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: powerpc-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28904


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/28904] operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC
  2006-08-30 15:21 [Bug c++/28904] New: operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC glibersat at linux62 dot org
@ 2006-08-31  2:41 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-08-31  4:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-31  2:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|major                       |normal


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28904


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/28904] operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC
  2006-08-30 15:21 [Bug c++/28904] New: operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC glibersat at linux62 dot org
  2006-08-31  2:41 ` [Bug target/28904] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-31  4:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-08-31  4:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-31  4:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-08-31 04:30 -------
Hmm, I am going to go out on a limb and say we should 
produce about the following (hopefully I get the right macros):
la temp, ha16(.LC42716-.LCTOC1)(30)
lwz rn, lo16(.LC42716-.LCTOC1)(temp)

This is like what Darwin does for PIC.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28904


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/28904] operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC
  2006-08-30 15:21 [Bug c++/28904] New: operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC glibersat at linux62 dot org
  2006-08-31  2:41 ` [Bug target/28904] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-08-31  4:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-08-31  4:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2006-09-05 22:51 ` amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-08-31  4:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-08-31 04:34 -------
well, the syntax would be more like:
        addis 9,(.LC42716-.LCTOC1)@ha(30)
        lwz 0,.LC42716-.LCTOC1)@l(9)

But I don't know if this syntax will work.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28904


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/28904] operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC
  2006-08-30 15:21 [Bug c++/28904] New: operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC glibersat at linux62 dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-08-31  4:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-09-05 22:51 ` amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
  2007-06-26 16:12 ` srm at schokokeks dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au @ 2006-09-05 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from amodra at bigpond dot net dot au  2006-09-05 22:50 -------
This is a limitation of the -fPIC implementation used on powerpc-linux.  You
get a maximum of 64K bytes of GOT entries per function (ie. 16K entries). 
-fpic is even more limited, with only 64K bytes of GOT for the entire
executable.  (-fpic used to be 32k for the entire executable until the linker
was enhanced.)


-- 

amodra at bigpond dot net dot au changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2006-09-05 22:50:51
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28904


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/28904] operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC
  2006-08-30 15:21 [Bug c++/28904] New: operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC glibersat at linux62 dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-09-05 22:51 ` amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
@ 2007-06-26 16:12 ` srm at schokokeks dot org
  2007-06-26 20:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: srm at schokokeks dot org @ 2007-06-26 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from srm at schokokeks dot org  2007-06-26 16:12 -------
the same here on gentoo-ppc-2.6.21, using gcc-4.1.2
Powerbook G4(5,6)
trying to compile Crystalspace v1.2 --with-python
When ommiting -fPIC OR using --without-python, the build works.
I will see if a revert to 4.1.1 brings any advancement for 4.1.2 is marked as
testing on gentoo-ppc.


-- 

srm at schokokeks dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |srm at schokokeks dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28904


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/28904] operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC
  2006-08-30 15:21 [Bug c++/28904] New: operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC glibersat at linux62 dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-06-26 16:12 ` srm at schokokeks dot org
@ 2007-06-26 20:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2007-06-26 20:36 ` srm at schokokeks dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-26 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-06-26 20:30 -------
They have been improvements in 4.2.0 with respect of having a smaller GOT.  Can
you try 4.2.0?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28904


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/28904] operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC
  2006-08-30 15:21 [Bug c++/28904] New: operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC glibersat at linux62 dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-06-26 20:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-06-26 20:36 ` srm at schokokeks dot org
  2007-06-27  8:06 ` srm at schokokeks dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: srm at schokokeks dot org @ 2007-06-26 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from srm at schokokeks dot org  2007-06-26 20:35 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> They have been improvements in 4.2.0 with respect of having a smaller GOT.  Can
> you try 4.2.0?
> 

uh, i'd like to...give me a few days to figure out how i can do a proper
upgrade or setup a sandbox for testing.
I will check back with the results.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28904


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/28904] operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC
  2006-08-30 15:21 [Bug c++/28904] New: operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC glibersat at linux62 dot org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-06-26 20:36 ` srm at schokokeks dot org
@ 2007-06-27  8:06 ` srm at schokokeks dot org
  2007-07-07 13:37 ` srm at schokokeks dot org
  2009-05-14  4:03 ` bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: srm at schokokeks dot org @ 2007-06-27  8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from srm at schokokeks dot org  2007-06-27 08:06 -------
I have checked with 4.2.0 and it produces the same error.
Maybe i'd like to rebuild python too with 4.2?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28904


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/28904] operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC
  2006-08-30 15:21 [Bug c++/28904] New: operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC glibersat at linux62 dot org
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-06-27  8:06 ` srm at schokokeks dot org
@ 2007-07-07 13:37 ` srm at schokokeks dot org
  2009-05-14  4:03 ` bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: srm at schokokeks dot org @ 2007-07-07 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from srm at schokokeks dot org  2007-07-07 13:37 -------
crystalspace also has a bug report for this
(http://www.crystalspace3d.org/trac/CS/ticket/210)

as mentioned there, one could try this
http://www.crystalspace3d.org/trac/CS/ticket/258 which is using a special
branch for the python modules. using this branch, i had no problem building the
python modules. maybe it's worth a look for you :)
i dont really get the point...but, eager to... 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28904


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/28904] operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC
  2006-08-30 15:21 [Bug c++/28904] New: operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC glibersat at linux62 dot org
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2007-07-07 13:37 ` srm at schokokeks dot org
@ 2009-05-14  4:03 ` bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: bje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-05-14  4:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-05-14 04:03 -------
The original reporter seems to have resolved this to their satisfaction in
their CrystalSpace3d bug report.  This report was due to running up against a
limitation of the -fPIC implementation.


-- 

bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28904


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-14  4:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-08-30 15:21 [Bug c++/28904] New: operand out of range on Linux/PowerPC glibersat at linux62 dot org
2006-08-31  2:41 ` [Bug target/28904] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-31  4:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-08-31  4:34 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-09-05 22:51 ` amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
2007-06-26 16:12 ` srm at schokokeks dot org
2007-06-26 20:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-26 20:36 ` srm at schokokeks dot org
2007-06-27  8:06 ` srm at schokokeks dot org
2007-07-07 13:37 ` srm at schokokeks dot org
2009-05-14  4:03 ` bje at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).