From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29808 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2007 18:11:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 29770 invoked by alias); 9 Jul 2007 18:11:09 -0000 Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 18:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070709181109.29769.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/32705] [4.3 Regression] ICE in set_ssa_val_to, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:1022 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "dberlin at dberlin dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg01119.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-09 18:11 ------- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] ICE in set_ssa_val_to, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:1022 Uh, this assert was removed, so i don't know how it could still trigger ;) On 9 Jul 2007 17:36:22 -0000, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > > ------- Comment #1 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-09 17:36 ------- > Confirmed on platforms where the Ada compiler bootstraps at all. :-) > > I plan to look at them once I've found something plausible for PR 32589. > > > -- > > ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot > | |org > Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW > Ever Confirmed|0 |1 > Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-07-09 17:36:22 > date| | > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32705 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32705