public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/32592] New: Suggest more optimize options and tweaking
@ 2007-07-02 18:44 rob1weld at aol dot com
2007-07-02 19:09 ` [Bug c/32592] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-17 3:01 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: rob1weld at aol dot com @ 2007-07-02 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
The File: gcc.info, Node: Optimize Options does list some fine features.
On this page: http://www.pathscale.com/docs.html is this whitepaper:
Maximizing Application Performance Through Inter-procedural Optimization by Dr.
Fred Chow
http://www.pathscale.com/pdf/IPA-paper.pdf
It shows on pages 9 and 10 a list of IPA and inlining options that exceed our
"-fipa-pta" and friends. They also use different default values in some cases
where 'similar' features are offered.
The other whitepaper, "Automated Application Tuning", is great too:
http://www.pathscale.com/pdf/PathOpt2-paper.pdf
These ideas would be fine enhancements to GCC 4.3.0.
--
Summary: Suggest more optimize options and tweaking
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rob1weld at aol dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32592
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/32592] Suggest more optimize options and tweaking
2007-07-02 18:44 [Bug c/32592] New: Suggest more optimize options and tweaking rob1weld at aol dot com
@ 2007-07-02 19:09 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-17 3:01 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-07-02 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-02 19:08 -------
No GCC is not in the business of auto tunning options.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WONTFIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32592
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/32592] Suggest more optimize options and tweaking
2007-07-02 18:44 [Bug c/32592] New: Suggest more optimize options and tweaking rob1weld at aol dot com
2007-07-02 19:09 ` [Bug c/32592] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-07-17 3:01 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: rob1weld at aol dot com @ 2007-07-17 3:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2007-07-17 03:01 -------
>It shows on pages 9 and 10 a list of IPA and inlining options that exceed our
>"-fipa-pta" and friends. They also use different default values in some cases
>where 'similar' features are offered.
If no "auto-tuning" (which do have patches coming from others), do you like the
part about the "inlining" and "inter-procedural analysis" ?
They have more options that allow finer tweaking. We could implement finer
tweaking. (See pages 9 + 10).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32592
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-17 3:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-02 18:44 [Bug c/32592] New: Suggest more optimize options and tweaking rob1weld at aol dot com
2007-07-02 19:09 ` [Bug c/32592] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-07-17 3:01 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).