[Bug bootstrap/28102] New: GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[Bug bootstrap/28102] New: GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[tbm at cyrius dot com]

GCC 4.2 on GNU Hurd currently fails to bootstrap with the following error:

> cc -c   -g -DIN_GCC   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-format-attribute -fno-common   -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src/gcc -I../../sr
c/gcc/. -I../../src/gcc/../include -I../../src/gcc/../libcpp/include 
-I../../src/gcc/../libdecnumber
-I../libdecnumber    ../../src/gcc/c-common.c -o c-common.o
> In file included from ../../src/gcc/c-common.c:3367:
> ../../src/gcc/builtins.def: In function 'c_common_nodes_and_builtins':
> ../../src/gcc/builtins.def:178: error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared (first use in this function)
> ../../src/gcc/builtins.def:178: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> ../../src/gcc/builtins.def:178: error: for each function it appears in.)
> make[5]: *** [c-common.o] Error 1
> make[5]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20060613/build/gcc'

This is probably due to the patch from
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg01493.html
commit
r111235 | jsm28 | 2006-02-18 12:12:51 +0100 (Sat, 18 Feb 2006) | 82 lines

The glibc dynamic linker on GNU is /lib/ld.so.1

I tried to define GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER in gcc/config/gnu.h but it seems that's
not the right fix.


-- 
           Summary: GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: bootstrap
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: tbm at cyrius dot com
 GCC build triplet: i486-gnu
GCC target triplet: i486-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|bootstrap                   |target
           Keywords|                            |build
            Summary|GNU Hurd bootstrap error:   |[4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd
                   |'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared   |bootstrap error:
                   |                            |'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.2.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-06-20 17:50 -------
Why is GNU target including linux.h header at all?
TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS should be overridden in gnu.h anyways.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[ams at gnu dot org]

------- Comment #2 from ams at gnu dot org  2006-07-15 13:45 -------
Created an attachment (id=11892)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11892&action=view)
Fixes #28102

(In reply to comment #1)
> Why is GNU target including linux.h header at all?
> TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS should be overridden in gnu.h anyways.

Because the rules in config.gcc say so:

*-*-gnu*)
...
    i[34567]86-*-*)
      tm_file="${cpu_type}/${cpu_type}.h i386/unix.h i386/att.h dbxelf.h
elfos.\
h svr4.h linux.h i386/linux.h gnu.h ${tm_file}"
...


Here is a patch that fixes the problem.

gcc/ChangeLog
2006-07-15  Alfred M. Szmidt  <ams@gnu.org>

       * config/i386/gnu.h (TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS): Undefine macro.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

Re: [Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[Andrew Pinski]

On Jul 15, 2006, at 10:45 PM, ams at gnu dot org wrote:

> Because the rules in config.gcc say so:

And that is not why, but that is what is causing linux.h being included?
Again why is Linux.h being included?

-- Pinski

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[pinskia at gmail dot com]

------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com  2006-07-15 14:56 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared


On Jul 15, 2006, at 10:45 PM, ams at gnu dot org wrote:

> Because the rules in config.gcc say so:

And that is not why, but that is what is causing linux.h being included?
Again why is Linux.h being included?

-- Pinski


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[ams at gnu dot org]

------- Comment #4 from ams at gnu dot org  2006-07-15 15:17 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared

   > Because the rules in config.gcc say so:

   And that is not why, but that is what is causing linux.h being
   included?  Again why is Linux.h being included?

GNU and GNU/Linux are similar enough not to warrant duplication of the
code from linux.h in gnu.h.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

Re: [Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[Andrew Pinski]

On Jul 16, 2006, at 12:17 AM, ams at gnu dot org wrote:

> GNU and GNU/Linux are similar enough not to warrant duplication of the
> code from linux.h in gnu.h.

Depends, the duplication is small anyways as linux.h is only 129 lines
(including copyright and comments).
In fact it is way wrong now anyways as there is no uclibc for hurd.


So the duplication factor should not matter as there is hardly any
duplication.

Only the following code will be duplicated which is hardly any after  
all:
/* Don't assume anything about the header files.  */
#define NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C

#undef ASM_APP_ON
#define ASM_APP_ON "#APP\n"

#undef ASM_APP_OFF
#define ASM_APP_OFF "#NO_APP\n"

#undef MD_EXEC_PREFIX
#undef MD_STARTFILE_PREFIX

#undef  STARTFILE_SPEC
#if defined HAVE_LD_PIE
#define STARTFILE_SPEC \
   "%{!shared: %{pg|p|profile:gcrt1.o%s;pie:Scrt1.o%s;:crt1.o%s}} \
    crti.o%s %{static:crtbeginT.o%s;shared|pie:crtbeginS.o% 
s;:crtbegin.o%s}"
#else
#define STARTFILE_SPEC \
   "%{!shared: %{pg|p|profile:gcrt1.o%s;:crt1.o%s}} \
    crti.o%s %{static:crtbeginT.o%s;shared|pie:crtbeginS.o% 
s;:crtbegin.o%s}"
#endif


#undef  ENDFILE_SPEC
#define ENDFILE_SPEC \
   "%{shared|pie:crtendS.o%s;:crtend.o%s} crtn.o%s"

#ifndef CC1_SPEC
#define CC1_SPEC "%{profile:-p}"
#endif

#undef CPLUSPLUS_CPP_SPEC
#define CPLUSPLUS_CPP_SPEC "-D_GNU_SOURCE %(cpp)"

#if defined(HAVE_LD_EH_FRAME_HDR)
#define LINK_EH_SPEC "%{!static:--eh-frame-hdr} "
#endif

/* Define this so we can compile MS code for use with WINE.  */
#define HANDLE_PRAGMA_PACK_PUSH_POP

#define LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC \
   "%{static:--start-group} %G %L %{static:--end-group}%{!static:%G}"

/* Use --as-needed -lgcc_s for eh support.  */
#ifdef HAVE_LD_AS_NEEDED
#define USE_LD_AS_NEEDED 1
#endif

#define TARGET_POSIX_IO

-- Pinski

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu]

------- Comment #5 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2006-07-15 15:27 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared


On Jul 16, 2006, at 12:17 AM, ams at gnu dot org wrote:

> GNU and GNU/Linux are similar enough not to warrant duplication of the
> code from linux.h in gnu.h.

Depends, the duplication is small anyways as linux.h is only 129 lines
(including copyright and comments).
In fact it is way wrong now anyways as there is no uclibc for hurd.


So the duplication factor should not matter as there is hardly any
duplication.

Only the following code will be duplicated which is hardly any after  
all:
/* Don't assume anything about the header files.  */
#define NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C

#undef ASM_APP_ON
#define ASM_APP_ON "#APP\n"

#undef ASM_APP_OFF
#define ASM_APP_OFF "#NO_APP\n"

#undef MD_EXEC_PREFIX
#undef MD_STARTFILE_PREFIX

#undef  STARTFILE_SPEC
#if defined HAVE_LD_PIE
#define STARTFILE_SPEC \
   "%{!shared: %{pg|p|profile:gcrt1.o%s;pie:Scrt1.o%s;:crt1.o%s}} \
    crti.o%s %{static:crtbeginT.o%s;shared|pie:crtbeginS.o% 
s;:crtbegin.o%s}"
#else
#define STARTFILE_SPEC \
   "%{!shared: %{pg|p|profile:gcrt1.o%s;:crt1.o%s}} \
    crti.o%s %{static:crtbeginT.o%s;shared|pie:crtbeginS.o% 
s;:crtbegin.o%s}"
#endif


#undef  ENDFILE_SPEC
#define ENDFILE_SPEC \
   "%{shared|pie:crtendS.o%s;:crtend.o%s} crtn.o%s"

#ifndef CC1_SPEC
#define CC1_SPEC "%{profile:-p}"
#endif

#undef CPLUSPLUS_CPP_SPEC
#define CPLUSPLUS_CPP_SPEC "-D_GNU_SOURCE %(cpp)"

#if defined(HAVE_LD_EH_FRAME_HDR)
#define LINK_EH_SPEC "%{!static:--eh-frame-hdr} "
#endif

/* Define this so we can compile MS code for use with WINE.  */
#define HANDLE_PRAGMA_PACK_PUSH_POP

#define LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC \
   "%{static:--start-group} %G %L %{static:--end-group}%{!static:%G}"

/* Use --as-needed -lgcc_s for eh support.  */
#ifdef HAVE_LD_AS_NEEDED
#define USE_LD_AS_NEEDED 1
#endif

#define TARGET_POSIX_IO

-- Pinski


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[ams at gnu dot org]

------- Comment #6 from ams at gnu dot org  2006-07-15 15:45 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared

   Only the following code will be duplicated which is hardly any
   after all:

That is from [gcc]/gcc/config/linux.h, I'm talking about
[gcc]/gcc/config/i386/{linux,gnu}.h.  Which is also the one causing
problems without the patch I sent.

I don't want/have time/etc to worry about this right now, it isn't a
very high priority thing anyway.  I also don't think it is a very good
idea to copy the content form */linux.h into */gnu.h...

FYI, GNU/k*BSD also uses the GNU/Linux headers, and it doesn't support
uclibc AFAIK.

Cheers.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

Re: [Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[Andrew Pinski]

On Jul 16, 2006, at 12:45 AM, ams at gnu dot org wrote:

> That is from [gcc]/gcc/config/linux.h, I'm talking about
> [gcc]/gcc/config/i386/{linux,gnu}.h.  Which is also the one causing
> problems without the patch I sent.

bzzz, wrong. TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS is not defined anywhere in
config/i386/linux.h, it is defined in config/linux.h.  Also
powerpc-gnu and alpha-gnu are going to have the same issue.
powerpc-gnu is worse though.

Please try again at actually looking into this issue.
It is obviously you did not look into that much.

Also kBSD is incorrect anyways and should be fixed in the same
matter but that is a different bug.


-- Pinski

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu]

------- Comment #7 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2006-07-15 15:58 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared


On Jul 16, 2006, at 12:45 AM, ams at gnu dot org wrote:

> That is from [gcc]/gcc/config/linux.h, I'm talking about
> [gcc]/gcc/config/i386/{linux,gnu}.h.  Which is also the one causing
> problems without the patch I sent.

bzzz, wrong. TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS is not defined anywhere in
config/i386/linux.h, it is defined in config/linux.h.  Also
powerpc-gnu and alpha-gnu are going to have the same issue.
powerpc-gnu is worse though.

Please try again at actually looking into this issue.
It is obviously you did not look into that much.

Also kBSD is incorrect anyways and should be fixed in the same
matter but that is a different bug.


-- Pinski


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[ams at gnu dot org]

------- Comment #8 from ams at gnu dot org  2006-07-15 16:07 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared

Can you please just apply the patch and close the bug?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu]

------- Comment #9 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2006-07-15 16:10 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared


On Jul 16, 2006, at 1:07 AM, ams at gnu dot org wrote:

> Can you please just apply the patch and close the bug?

Why it is not obvious and I say the patch is incorrect.

-- Pinski


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

Re: [Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[Andrew Pinski]

On Jul 16, 2006, at 1:07 AM, ams at gnu dot org wrote:

> Can you please just apply the patch and close the bug?

Why it is not obvious and I say the patch is incorrect.

-- Pinski

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu]

------- Comment #10 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2006-07-15 16:14 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared


On Jul 16, 2006, at 1:10 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> Why it is not obvious and I say the patch is incorrect.

Oh did I forget (again) to say you really should be posting
patches to the gcc-patches mailing list. If you want them
be included.  And I still say the patch is incorrect.  I already
explained why I thought it was incorrect as linux.h should not
be included.  Also the comment in your patch is incorrect
as the definition comes from config/linux.h and not from
config/i386/linux.h.

-- Pinski


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

Re: [Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[Andrew Pinski]

On Jul 16, 2006, at 1:10 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> Why it is not obvious and I say the patch is incorrect.

Oh did I forget (again) to say you really should be posting
patches to the gcc-patches mailing list. If you want them
be included.  And I still say the patch is incorrect.  I already
explained why I thought it was incorrect as linux.h should not
be included.  Also the comment in your patch is incorrect
as the definition comes from config/linux.h and not from
config/i386/linux.h.

-- Pinski

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[ams at gnu dot org]

------- Comment #11 from ams at gnu dot org  2006-07-15 16:25 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared

   > Can you please just apply the patch and close the bug?

   Why it is not obvious and I say the patch is incorrect.

The patch is correct, that you think that the code we use from
*/linux.h should be in */gnu.h is not related to this bug.  This is
the setup we have used for almost 10 years, and I see no reason to
change it.  The setup works, it minimises the workload on both
parties, and it is clean.

If you don't want to commit the patch then that is fine, it isn't like
GCC can even compile on the GNU system due to the other bugs with
patches being neglected (mostly by me).

Happy hacking.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[ams at gnu dot org]

------- Comment #12 from ams at gnu dot org  2006-07-15 16:27 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared

   Oh did I forget (again) to say you really should be posting patches
   to the gcc-patches mailing list.

Thanks.  I'm actually quite aware of that.  I haven't gotten around to
cleaning it all up so that I can send it to gcc-patches@ in one go.

   Also the comment in your patch is incorrect as the definition comes
   from config/linux.h and not from config/i386/linux.h.

Thanks.  I confused it with config/alpha/linux which defines
TARGET_C99_FUNCTIONS.

Cheers.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

Re: [Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[Andrew Pinski]

On Jul 16, 2006, at 1:25 AM, ams at gnu dot org wrote:

> The patch is correct, that you think that the code we use from
> */linux.h should be in */gnu.h is not related to this bug.  This is
> the setup we have used for almost 10 years, and I see no reason to
> change it.  The setup works, it minimises the workload on both
> parties, and it is clean.

Actually you are incorrect about not being related to this bug
as it is the reason why this bug showed up and it is not clean
as shown by this bug.

Move along and fix/post a correct fix to the mailing list.

-- Pinski

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu]

------- Comment #13 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2006-07-15 16:29 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared


On Jul 16, 2006, at 1:25 AM, ams at gnu dot org wrote:

> The patch is correct, that you think that the code we use from
> */linux.h should be in */gnu.h is not related to this bug.  This is
> the setup we have used for almost 10 years, and I see no reason to
> change it.  The setup works, it minimises the workload on both
> parties, and it is clean.

Actually you are incorrect about not being related to this bug
as it is the reason why this bug showed up and it is not clean
as shown by this bug.

Move along and fix/post a correct fix to the mailing list.

-- Pinski


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[ams at gnu dot org]

------- Comment #14 from ams at gnu dot org  2006-07-15 16:55 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared

I think we will have to agree to disagree on this, since neither you
or I will change our minds. :-)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[wieseltux23 at gmail dot com]

------- Comment #15 from wieseltux23 at gmail dot com  2006-07-15 18:00 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error:
 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

http://en.fon.com/


On 15 Jul 2006 16:14:34 -0000
"pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> ------- Comment #10 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2006-07-15 16:14 -------
> Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
> undeclared
> 
> 
> On Jul 16, 2006, at 1:10 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >
> > Why it is not obvious and I say the patch is incorrect.
> 
> Oh did I forget (again) to say you really should be posting
> patches to the gcc-patches mailing list. If you want them
> be included.  And I still say the patch is incorrect.  I already
> explained why I thought it was incorrect as linux.h should not
> be included.  Also the comment in your patch is incorrect
> as the definition comes from config/linux.h and not from
> config/i386/linux.h.
> 
> -- Pinski
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102
> 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

Re: [Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[wieseltux23]

http://en.fon.com/


On 15 Jul 2006 16:14:34 -0000
"pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> ------- Comment #10 from pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu  2006-07-15 16:14 -------
> Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
> undeclared
> 
> 
> On Jul 16, 2006, at 1:10 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >
> > Why it is not obvious and I say the patch is incorrect.
> 
> Oh did I forget (again) to say you really should be posting
> patches to the gcc-patches mailing list. If you want them
> be included.  And I still say the patch is incorrect.  I already
> explained why I thought it was incorrect as linux.h should not
> be included.  Also the comment in your patch is incorrect
> as the definition comes from config/linux.h and not from
> config/i386/linux.h.
> 
> -- Pinski
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102
> 

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[wieseltux23 at gmail dot com]

------- Comment #16 from wieseltux23 at gmail dot com  2006-07-15 18:01 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error:
 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

http://en.fon.com/

On 15 Jul 2006 16:25:10 -0000
"ams at gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> ------- Comment #11 from ams at gnu dot org  2006-07-15 16:25 -------
> Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
> undeclared
> 
>    > Can you please just apply the patch and close the bug?
> 
>    Why it is not obvious and I say the patch is incorrect.
> 
> The patch is correct, that you think that the code we use from
> */linux.h should be in */gnu.h is not related to this bug.  This is
> the setup we have used for almost 10 years, and I see no reason to
> change it.  The setup works, it minimises the workload on both
> parties, and it is clean.
> 
> If you don't want to commit the patch then that is fine, it isn't like
> GCC can even compile on the GNU system due to the other bugs with
> patches being neglected (mostly by me).
> 
> Happy hacking.
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102
> 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

Re: [Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[wieseltux23]

http://en.fon.com/

On 15 Jul 2006 16:25:10 -0000
"ams at gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> ------- Comment #11 from ams at gnu dot org  2006-07-15 16:25 -------
> Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
> undeclared
> 
>    > Can you please just apply the patch and close the bug?
> 
>    Why it is not obvious and I say the patch is incorrect.
> 
> The patch is correct, that you think that the code we use from
> */linux.h should be in */gnu.h is not related to this bug.  This is
> the setup we have used for almost 10 years, and I see no reason to
> change it.  The setup works, it minimises the workload on both
> parties, and it is clean.
> 
> If you don't want to commit the patch then that is fine, it isn't like
> GCC can even compile on the GNU system due to the other bugs with
> patches being neglected (mostly by me).
> 
> Happy hacking.
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102
> 

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[tbm at cyrius dot com]

------- Comment #15 from tbm at cyrius dot com  2006-07-26 15:25 -------
One of our (Debian's) Hurd porters has confirmed that this patch works. 
Alfred, can you please clean it up and submit it to gcc-patches.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[ams at gnu dot org]

------- Comment #16 from ams at gnu dot org  2006-07-26 15:35 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared

I'll try to get around it as soon as I can.  Thanks.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #17 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-08-23 18:53 -------
(In reply to comment #16)
> Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
> undeclared
> 
> I'll try to get around it as soon as I can.  Thanks.

It has been a month... would be nice if you could look at it soon.


-- 

tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2006-08-23 18:53:11
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

Re: [Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[Alfred M. Szmidt]

   > I'll try to get around it as soon as I can.  Thanks.

   It has been a month... would be nice if you could look at it soon.

Thanks for poking, I got stuck on a strange bug that causes make to
assert while building the Java bits and I haven't gotten around to
fixing it.  I'll try and get around to atleast fixing this bug ASAP;
which may take some time. :( Is there a hurry getting this in, I could
try and reprioritise my tasks if it is urgent.

Happy hacking, and thanks.

[Bug target/28102] [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[ams at gnu dot org]

------- Comment #18 from ams at gnu dot org  2006-08-24 18:05 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared

   > I'll try to get around it as soon as I can.  Thanks.

   It has been a month... would be nice if you could look at it soon.

Thanks for poking, I got stuck on a strange bug that causes make to
assert while building the Java bits and I haven't gotten around to
fixing it.  I'll try and get around to atleast fixing this bug ASAP;
which may take some time. :( Is there a hurry getting this in, I could
try and reprioritise my tasks if it is urgent.

Happy hacking, and thanks.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #19 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-05-14 22:28 -------
Will not be fixed in 4.2.0; retargeting at 4.2.1.


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.2.0                       |4.2.1


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.2.1                       |4.2.2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #20 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-10-01 11:55 -------
Tripping exactly this while thinking about uclibc on hurd.

To me it looks like linux.h shouldn't be included and gnu.h should be made
uclibc-aware..


-- 

aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[ams at gnu dot org]

------- Comment #21 from ams at gnu dot org  2007-10-01 18:04 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared

   To me it looks like linux.h shouldn't be included

It should be included.

   and gnu.h should be made uclibc-aware..

This would be nice, would you like to do that?  I have far to much to
handle right now.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #22 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-10-01 18:36 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
undeclared

On 1 Oct 2007 18:04:09 -0000, ams at gnu dot org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #21 from ams at gnu dot org  2007-10-01 18:04 -------
> Subject: Re:  [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
> undeclared
>
>    To me it looks like linux.h shouldn't be included
>
> It should be included.

Again why?  You still have not explained why HURD is Linux?  Because
as far as I can tell it is not.

-- Pinski


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

Re: [Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[Andrew Pinski]

On 1 Oct 2007 18:04:09 -0000, ams at gnu dot org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #21 from ams at gnu dot org  2007-10-01 18:04 -------
> Subject: Re:  [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC'
> undeclared
>
>    To me it looks like linux.h shouldn't be included
>
> It should be included.

Again why?  You still have not explained why HURD is Linux?  Because
as far as I can tell it is not.

-- Pinski

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #23 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-10-09 19:22 -------
Change target milestone to 4.2.3, as 4.2.2 has been released.


-- 

mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.2.2                       |4.2.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org]

------- Comment #24 from samuel dot thibault at ens-lyon dot org  2007-11-04 16:42 -------
It's rather the converse: Linux is much like Hurd, since they're both
GNU-based, so quite logically they should share most of the configuration
stuff. 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[ojab at ojab dot ru]

------- Comment #25 from ojab at ojab dot ru  2007-12-27 17:17 -------
Is it any progress?


-- 

ojab at ojab dot ru changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ojab at ojab dot ru


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[tschwinge at gnu dot org]

------- Comment #26 from tschwinge at gnu dot org  2007-12-27 18:23 -------
Here is what I proposed / asked:
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-11/msg00289.html>

Unfortunately I didn't get a definitive answer.  I did not yet start to
implement the ideas I described.  I don't know if such a patch would finally be
applied to the GCC repository.

In the mean time I'm using these patches:
<http://www.schwinge.homeip.net/~thomas/tmp/gcc-patches/>


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #27 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-02-01 16:53 -------
4.2.3 is being released now, changing milestones of open bugs to 4.2.4.


-- 

jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.2.3                       |4.2.4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #28 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-05-19 20:22 -------
4.2.4 is being released, changing milestones to 4.2.5.


-- 

jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.2.4                       |4.2.5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #29 from tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-11-13 23:30 -------
Subject: Bug 28102

Author: tschwinge
Date: Thu Nov 13 23:28:46 2008
New Revision: 141838

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141838
Log:
2008-11-13  Thomas Schwinge  <tschwinge@gnu.org>

        PR target/28102
        * config.gcc (*-*-gnu*): Move Alpha parts into the `alpha*-*-gnu*', x86
        parts into the `i[34567]86-*-linux*' and parts that are independent of
        the processor architecture into the `*-*-linux*' cases.
        (*-*-linux*): Consider `linux.opt' only for Linux-based configurations.
        * config/i386/gnu.h (GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER): Redefine.
        (TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS, LINK_SPEC): Don't redefine.
        [TARGET_LIBC_PROVIDES_SSP] (TARGET_THREAD_SSP_OFFSET): Undefine.
        * config/gnu.h (NO_IMPLICIT_EXTERN_C): Don't redefine.
        (HURD_TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS): Don't define, but instead...
        (LINUX_TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS): Redefine.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/config.gcc
    trunk/gcc/config/gnu.h
    trunk/gcc/config/i386/gnu.h


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2006-08-23 18:53:11         |2008-11-13 23:40:06
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #30 from tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-11-13 23:42 -------
I have fixed this on the GCC trunk.  Installing this fix on the 4.2 and 4.3
branches would be very difficult I was told, so we're going to abstain from
even trying and are happy with a functional GCC trunk / 4.4 again.  :-)


-- 

tschwinge at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102

[Bug target/28102] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] GNU Hurd bootstrap error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' undeclared

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.2.5                       |4.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28102