From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-225251-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22092 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2007 17:12:52 -0000
Received: (qmail 22063 invoked by uid 48); 22 Jul 2007 17:12:42 -0000
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 17:12:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20070722171242.22062.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-32856-3511@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug c/32856] Invalid optimization in the face of aliasing
In-Reply-To: <bug-32856-3511@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "felix-gcc at fefe dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg02270.txt.bz2



------- Comment #2 from felix-gcc at fefe dot de  2007-07-22 17:12 -------
FWIW, the C compilers from Intel and Sun do reload n->next.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32856