From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14619 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2007 09:40:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 14500 invoked by uid 48); 23 Jul 2007 09:39:57 -0000 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 09:40:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070723093957.14499.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug bootstrap/32829] CVS bootstrap failure with as: unrecognised option -Qy In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "brian dot sidebotham at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg02325.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from brian dot sidebotham at gmail dot com 2007-07-23 09:39 ------- Here is the output of a correctly built and installed toolchain: > arm-elf-as -V arm-elf-as: unrecognized option `-V' > arm-elf-as -Qy arm-elf-as: unrecognized option `-Qy' > arm-elf-as --version GNU assembler 2.17 Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License. This program has absolutely no warranty. This assembler was configured for a target of `arm-elf'. > arm-elf-gcc --version arm-elf-gcc (GCC) 4.1.1 Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. I don't think it's a binutils error, because the arm-elf target has never supported -Qy or -V. I thought that gcc made a decision depending on what tools it was making as to whether it would emit those options or not, hence why I posted the problem here. I can only go on what I've read over the internet though, as I don't even know what these options do, they are not documented in the gas documentation as far as I can see. I have seen some comments suggesting this error could be thrown up if there is a $PATH error. I will investigate to make sure the PATH is emitted correctly in my build script too. Or, are you saying that binutils must now support -Qy and -V for the arm-elf target? Thanks for your time. Brian. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32829