From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12633 invoked by alias); 23 Jul 2007 23:18:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 12604 invoked by uid 48); 23 Jul 2007 23:17:48 -0000 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070723231748.12603.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/32865] [4.3 Regression] glibc ICE's gcc-4.3.0 SSA corruption In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "michelin60 at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg02387.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #11 from michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-07-23 23:17 ------- Very interesting Using a colleague's i686 machine vfprintf.c did not fail with recent gcc-4.3. This led to further research prompting not only the CC's but also the quote. Dr. Edelsohn metioned triage but there are no triage officers in the MAINTERNER list. Also it might be useful to spell out the rights of submitters. It might discourage submissions which are quite onerous to conform to the already stated requirements. >>From his webpage Mr. Berlin is a lawyer specializing in intellectual property and is also an author. He might want to provide some legal advice on conflicts of interest. The quote is specific to glibc and AIX. Potentially the AIX contortions forced upon glibc by Dr. Edelsohn could have caused the specific problem reported, not affecting i686. As an aside the officers of kernel.org (Torvalds, Morton) spell out quite clearly how they are not liable to any interpretation of conflict of interest. -- michelin60 at gmail dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dje at watson dot ibm dot | |com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32865