From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26928 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2007 17:28:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 26733 invoked by alias); 26 Jul 2007 17:27:58 -0000 Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 17:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070726172758.26732.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug middle-end/32749] [4.3 regression]: gfortran.dg/auto_array_1.f90 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "seongbae dot park at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-07/txt/msg02699.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #20 from seongbae dot park at gmail dot com 2007-07-26 17:27 ------- Subject: Re: [4.3 regression]: gfortran.dg/auto_array_1.f90 On 7/26/07, Kenneth Zadeck wrote: > This patch extends the fix in > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-06/msg01557.html > to handle the case of clobbers inside conditional calls. > > This problem caused the regression of gfortran.dg/matmul_3.f90 on the > ia-64 in addition to the regression cited in this pr. > > Tested on ppc-32, ia-64 and x86-64. > > 2007-07-26 Kenneth Zadeck > > PR middle-end/32749 > > * df-problems.c (df_note_bb_compute): Handle case of clobber > inside conditional call. > > ok to commit? This change is OK. Though I wonder if we need to do similar checking for the regular insn case below. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32749