From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29184 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2007 19:42:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 29130 invoked by uid 48); 1 Aug 2007 19:42:14 -0000 Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070801194214.29129.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/32658] Supposedly illegal conversion compiles without errors In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #5 from nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-01 19:42 ------- The standard is unclear about exactly why this is ill-defined. Does the conversion operator take part in overload resolution (and then be rejected, if it is selected), or is it never entered into the overload set. I shall query CWG. -- nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |nathan at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-08-01 19:42:14 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32658