From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3123 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2007 08:02:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 1235 invoked by uid 48); 5 Aug 2007 08:02:14 -0000 Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2007 08:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070805080214.1234.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/32264] gcc 4.2.0 compiled vanilla kernel 2.4.34.5 crashes when VIA C3 optimized -march=c3 In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pluto at agmk dot net" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00276.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #18 from pluto at agmk dot net 2007-08-05 08:02 ------- (In reply to comment #17) > Subject: Re: gcc 4.2.0 compiled vanilla kernel > 2.4.34.5 crashes when VIA C3 optimized -march=c3 > > According to pluto at agmk dot net: > > > but who's bug is it? > > > > it's a kernel bug exposed by recent gcc. > > > > i'm still confused? is the kernel on which i > build defect - or the sources of the kernel > i compile are buggy? > > lots of questions anyway for me: > in with module? in which line? linux-2.4.35/include/asm-i386/hw_irq.h contains these evil macros. > how to patch? shouldn't we pass this to the kernel guys? > in which way can i do this most effectively? report this to lkml. -- pluto at agmk dot net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|pluto at agmk dot net | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32264