public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/32626] New: Run-time check for recursive functions
@ 2007-07-04 18:19 burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-06 14:07 ` [Bug fortran/32626] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-07-04 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
We probably need:
-fcheck-*
with
all
bounds
pointers
recursive
The recursive test is simple. C example:
bla(...)
{
static recursive = 0;
if(recursive)
exit_with_error
recursive = 1
...
recursive = 0; // Last statement
}
--
Summary: Run-time check for recursive functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32626
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/32626] Run-time check for recursive functions
2007-07-04 18:19 [Bug fortran/32626] New: Run-time check for recursive functions burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-08-06 14:07 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-25 15:23 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-08-06 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-08-06 14:06:57
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32626
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/32626] Run-time check for recursive functions
2007-07-04 18:19 [Bug fortran/32626] New: Run-time check for recursive functions burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-06 14:07 ` [Bug fortran/32626] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-10-25 15:23 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-01 7:27 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-25 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last reconfirmed|2007-08-06 14:06:57 |2007-10-25 15:23:24
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32626
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/32626] Run-time check for recursive functions
2007-07-04 18:19 [Bug fortran/32626] New: Run-time check for recursive functions burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-06 14:07 ` [Bug fortran/32626] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-25 15:23 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-01 7:27 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-07 16:20 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: domob at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-01 7:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-01 07:25 -------
Taking this on, as addition to PR 37779 about compile-time recursion checking.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2007-10-25 15:23:24 |2008-12-01 07:25:53
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32626
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/32626] Run-time check for recursive functions
2007-07-04 18:19 [Bug fortran/32626] New: Run-time check for recursive functions burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-01 7:27 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-07 16:20 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-28 14:04 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-28 14:08 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: domob at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-07 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-07 16:17 -------
Unassigning myself, Tobias has a working patch posted for 4.5.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|domob at gcc dot gnu dot org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
| |dot org
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32626
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/32626] Run-time check for recursive functions
2007-07-04 18:19 [Bug fortran/32626] New: Run-time check for recursive functions burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-07 16:20 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-28 14:04 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-28 14:08 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-28 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-28 14:04 -------
Subject: Bug 32626
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Mar 28 14:04:14 2009
New Revision: 145188
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=145188
Log:
2009-03-28 Tobias Burnus <burnus@net-b.de>
PR fortran/32626
* option.c (gfc_handle_runtime_check_option): Enable recursion check.
* trans-decl.c (gfc_generate_function_code): Add recursion check.
* invoke.texi (-fcheck): Add recursive option.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/recursive_check_7.f90
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/invoke.texi
trunk/gcc/fortran/options.c
trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32626
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/32626] Run-time check for recursive functions
2007-07-04 18:19 [Bug fortran/32626] New: Run-time check for recursive functions burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-03-28 14:04 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-28 14:08 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-28 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-28 14:08 -------
Fixed on the trunk (4.5):
At line 22 of file recursive_check_7.f90
Fortran runtime error: Recursive call to nonrecursive procedure 'invalid'
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32626
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-28 14:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-04 18:19 [Bug fortran/32626] New: Run-time check for recursive functions burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-08-06 14:07 ` [Bug fortran/32626] " fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-25 15:23 ` fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-01 7:27 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-07 16:20 ` domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-28 14:04 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-28 14:08 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).