From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27217 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2007 23:08:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 23307 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2007 23:07:53 -0000 Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 23:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070812230753.23306.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libfortran/32784] [win32] Using 'con' as assigned file generates Fortran runtime error: File 'con' does not exist In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pinskia at gmail dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg00835.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #26 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-08-12 23:07 ------- Subject: Re: [win32] Using 'con' as assigned file generates Fortran runtime error: File 'con' does not exist On 12 Aug 2007 22:45:07 -0000, steven dot chapel at sbcglobal dot net wrote: > The code above works with gcc 3.4.5. Which means it worked in g77 and not in gfortran (which is new for 4.0.0). Now we have this weird thing about how gfortran is a new front-end and g77 was removed. So this could go either as a regression or really a new feature. Also why does this program use con anyways, shouldn't it just use the default units which are connected to stdio/stdout anyways as they might not be connected to the console anyways? Thanks, Andrew Pinski -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32784