From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29614 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2007 20:30:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 27841 invoked by uid 48); 24 Aug 2007 20:30:34 -0000 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 20:30:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070824203034.27839.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug target/33049] [avr] bit extraction non optimal, inversing logic solves problem In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-08/txt/msg01820.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #6 from eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com 2007-08-24 20:30 ------- Created an attachment (id=14107) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14107&action=view) Test case assembler output for 4.2.1. Not really any better than 4.1.2. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049