public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/33277] [4.3 Regression]  Bootstrap check failures ICE's
Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070902134242.16820.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-33277-14842@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>



------- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2007-09-02 13:42 -------
> [18:23] < apinski> between 127935 and 128000

Fromp http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/, looking at the results from
"regress", it can be narrowed between 127961 (working) and 127997 (non
working).  Note that the last change of final.c is 127941 (outside the range). 
>From an uneducated guess, I'l say 127989, but I may be completely wrong.

>You know, there are many different targets that GCC supports, sometimes the
> patch does not cause any regression on one target can cause regressions on
> others.  This happens all the time.  You need to understand the main reason why
> we have the testsuite is so we easily see when a target has a regression or
> not.

Yes indeed! but the maintainers could look at the above URL to check that there
is no unexpected regression on untested platforms. If they have no access to
some of them, there could be a list of people to ask for details about the
failure (I volunteer for Darwin!).

Otherwise I fully agree with Andrew Pinski about what should not put in bug
reports.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33277


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-09-02 13:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-02  3:20 [Bug c/33277] New: [4.3.0 " michelin60 at gmail dot com
2007-09-02 11:36 ` [Bug target/33277] [4.3 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-02 11:41 ` [Bug middle-end/33277] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-02 13:42 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr [this message]
2007-09-02 13:50   ` Andrew Pinski
2007-09-02 13:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-02 15:23 ` michelin60 at gmail dot com
2007-09-02 16:01 ` [Bug middle-end/33277] [4.3 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c ICEs on ppc rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-02 17:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-02 17:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070902134242.16820.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).