public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/33277] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap check failures ICE's Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 13:42:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20070902134242.16820.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-33277-14842@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> ------- Comment #3 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-09-02 13:42 ------- > [18:23] < apinski> between 127935 and 128000 Fromp http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/, looking at the results from "regress", it can be narrowed between 127961 (working) and 127997 (non working). Note that the last change of final.c is 127941 (outside the range). >From an uneducated guess, I'l say 127989, but I may be completely wrong. >You know, there are many different targets that GCC supports, sometimes the > patch does not cause any regression on one target can cause regressions on > others. This happens all the time. You need to understand the main reason why > we have the testsuite is so we easily see when a target has a regression or > not. Yes indeed! but the maintainers could look at the above URL to check that there is no unexpected regression on untested platforms. If they have no access to some of them, there could be a list of people to ask for details about the failure (I volunteer for Darwin!). Otherwise I fully agree with Andrew Pinski about what should not put in bug reports. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33277
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-02 13:42 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2007-09-02 3:20 [Bug c/33277] New: [4.3.0 " michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-09-02 11:36 ` [Bug target/33277] [4.3 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 11:41 ` [Bug middle-end/33277] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 13:42 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr [this message] 2007-09-02 13:50 ` Andrew Pinski 2007-09-02 13:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 15:23 ` michelin60 at gmail dot com 2007-09-02 16:01 ` [Bug middle-end/33277] [4.3 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/930921-1.c ICEs on ppc rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 17:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-02 17:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20070902134242.16820.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).