From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-229989-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9847 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2007 11:58:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 9795 invoked by uid 48); 18 Sep 2007 11:58:24 -0000
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 11:58:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20070918115824.9794.qmail@sourceware.org>
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
References: <bug-31863-14521@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Subject: [Bug c++/31863] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] g++-4.1: out of memory with -O1/-O2
In-Reply-To: <bug-31863-14521@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg01437.txt.bz2



------- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-09-18 11:58 -------
Note that the double virtual inheritance in the Serializer template creates the
exponential behavior.  You can fix this at the source level by instead
doing

template <class Key, class Head>
class Serializer<Key, Loki::Typelist<Head, Loki::NullType> >:
    public virtual Serializer<Key, Head>
{
};

template <class Key, class Head, class Tail>
class Serializer<Key, Loki::Typelist<Head, Tail> >:
    public virtual Serializer<Key, Head>,
    public Serializer<Key, Tail>
{
};

template <class Key>
class Serializer<Key, Loki::NullType> : public virtual Factory<Key>
{
};

which also makes more sense(?).  Back to marking this as possibly a C++
frontend bug - though I'm inclined to close this bug as INVALID.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|tree-optimization           |c++


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31863