From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30490 invoked by alias); 21 Sep 2007 02:29:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 30464 invoked by uid 48); 21 Sep 2007 02:29:05 -0000 Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 02:29:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20070921022905.30463.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug c++/19614] Excessive memory consumption with a class with large (200) virtual (pure?) function and derived classes In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-09/txt/msg01729.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #14 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2007-09-21 02:29 ------- We are now again on par with gcc 3.3 in terms of memory use (3.3 uses 298 MB whereas 4.1 uses 280MB). This is a factor of 2 or 3 less than what we used to use. We are also about a factor of 2 faster than in the 3.3 and 3.4 times. I think we can close this one now. W. -- bangerth at dealii dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bangerth at dealii dot org Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19614