public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/26352] New: ICE
@ 2006-02-18 15:47 igodard at pacbell dot net
2006-02-18 15:48 ` [Bug c++/26352] ICE igodard at pacbell dot net
` (8 more replies)
0 siblings, 9 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: igodard at pacbell dot net @ 2006-02-18 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
Summary: ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: igodard at pacbell dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26352
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26352] ICE
2006-02-18 15:47 [Bug c++/26352] New: ICE igodard at pacbell dot net
2006-02-18 15:48 ` [Bug c++/26352] ICE igodard at pacbell dot net
@ 2006-02-18 15:48 ` igodard at pacbell dot net
2006-02-18 16:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: igodard at pacbell dot net @ 2006-02-18 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from igodard at pacbell dot net 2006-02-18 15:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=10874)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10874&action=view)
source code (compressed)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26352
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26352] ICE
2006-02-18 15:47 [Bug c++/26352] New: ICE igodard at pacbell dot net
@ 2006-02-18 15:48 ` igodard at pacbell dot net
2006-02-18 15:48 ` igodard at pacbell dot net
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: igodard at pacbell dot net @ 2006-02-18 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from igodard at pacbell dot net 2006-02-18 15:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=10873)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10873&action=view)
compiler output
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26352
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26352] ICE
2006-02-18 15:47 [Bug c++/26352] New: ICE igodard at pacbell dot net
2006-02-18 15:48 ` [Bug c++/26352] ICE igodard at pacbell dot net
2006-02-18 15:48 ` igodard at pacbell dot net
@ 2006-02-18 16:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-18 16:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-18 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 16:07 -------
g++: Internal error: Killed (program cc1plus)
means memory was over used.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |memory-hog
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26352
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26352] ICE
2006-02-18 15:47 [Bug c++/26352] New: ICE igodard at pacbell dot net
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-18 16:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-02-18 16:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-08 4:55 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-02-18 16:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-18 16:22 -------
I cannot reproduce this at all in 4.0.2, 4.0.0, or 4.0.3.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26352
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26352] ICE
2006-02-18 15:47 [Bug c++/26352] New: ICE igodard at pacbell dot net
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-02-18 16:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-08 4:55 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2006-03-08 6:16 ` igodard at pacbell dot net
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2006-03-08 4:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-03-08 04:55 -------
I see you used precompiled headers. Does the same ICE happen if you
don't do that?
W.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bangerth at dealii dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26352
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26352] ICE
2006-02-18 15:47 [Bug c++/26352] New: ICE igodard at pacbell dot net
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-08 4:55 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2006-03-08 6:16 ` igodard at pacbell dot net
2006-03-08 14:57 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: igodard at pacbell dot net @ 2006-03-08 6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from igodard at pacbell dot net 2006-03-08 06:16 -------
We don't use pre-compiled headers ourselves. Any precompiles are third-party or
standard library, and actually I was unaware that they were used. Can you tell
me the files that the header contained? Then I can identify where we got them
and might be able to get un-precompiled versions.
Ivan
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26352
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26352] ICE
2006-02-18 15:47 [Bug c++/26352] New: ICE igodard at pacbell dot net
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-08 6:16 ` igodard at pacbell dot net
@ 2006-03-08 14:57 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2006-03-08 19:29 ` igodard at pacbell dot net
2007-09-24 17:05 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2006-03-08 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-03-08 14:57 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> We don't use pre-compiled headers ourselves. Any precompiles are third-party or
> standard library, and actually I was unaware that they were used. Can you tell
> me the files that the header contained? Then I can identify where we got them
> and might be able to get un-precompiled versions.
All I can say is that in your log file I see the command line
/mnt/export/home/ivan/gcc/bin/../libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.2/cc1plus
-fpreprocessed powersetTest.ii -quiet -dumpbase powersetTest.cc
-mtune=pentiumpro -auxbase powersetTest -g -O0 -version -o powersetTest.s
Since I don't have your sources (and don't want to), I can't help you search
further.
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26352
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26352] ICE
2006-02-18 15:47 [Bug c++/26352] New: ICE igodard at pacbell dot net
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-08 14:57 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2006-03-08 19:29 ` igodard at pacbell dot net
2007-09-24 17:05 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: igodard at pacbell dot net @ 2006-03-08 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from igodard at pacbell dot net 2006-03-08 19:29 -------
Well I was really surprised to see this -fpreprocessed option in the -v output,
so I did a little digging. It seems that this option is set by the driver
whenever -save-temps is set. It does not come from my command line. Try it:
compile something -v, and then compile the same thing -v -save-temps and the
first -v will not have -fpreprocessed and the second one will.
The bug report instructions say to run with -save-temps so I do. You might ask
internally why the driver sets these when the user asks for -save-temps. I
think the generated -fpreprocessed is irrelevant to the bug, because it will be
set on every compile that produces a .ii file for you and I've put in a few of
those :-)
Ivan
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26352
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26352] ICE
2006-02-18 15:47 [Bug c++/26352] New: ICE igodard at pacbell dot net
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2006-03-08 19:29 ` igodard at pacbell dot net
@ 2007-09-24 17:05 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2007-09-24 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-24 17:05 -------
In any case, the pre-processed code doesn't compile anymore with 4.2 and
mainline.
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26352
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-24 17:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-18 15:47 [Bug c++/26352] New: ICE igodard at pacbell dot net
2006-02-18 15:48 ` [Bug c++/26352] ICE igodard at pacbell dot net
2006-02-18 15:48 ` igodard at pacbell dot net
2006-02-18 16:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-02-18 16:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-08 4:55 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2006-03-08 6:16 ` igodard at pacbell dot net
2006-03-08 14:57 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2006-03-08 19:29 ` igodard at pacbell dot net
2007-09-24 17:05 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).