public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/26747] New: break is not dectected until the gimplifier
@ 2006-03-18 16:28 pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-18 16:29 ` [Bug c++/26747] bad break/continue " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-18 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
Testcase:
void f(void)
{
break;
}
--
Summary: break is not dectected until the gimplifier
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
OtherBugsDependingO 24222
nThis:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26747
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26747] bad break/continue is not dectected until the gimplifier
2006-03-18 16:28 [Bug c++/26747] New: break is not dectected until the gimplifier pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-03-18 16:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-12 1:08 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-03-18 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-18 16:29 -------
This is only for the C++ front-end, the C front-end was fixed a while back.
Continue is the same issue
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|break is not dectected until|bad break/continue is not
|the gimplifier |dectected until the
| |gimplifier
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26747
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26747] bad break/continue is not dectected until the gimplifier
2006-03-18 16:28 [Bug c++/26747] New: break is not dectected until the gimplifier pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-18 16:29 ` [Bug c++/26747] bad break/continue " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-12 1:08 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2006-10-12 1:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2006-10-12 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2006-10-12 01:08 -------
What exactly is the problem here? I get this as an error message:
g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-4.2-pre/bin/c++ -c x.cc
x.cc: In function ‘void f()’:
x.cc:3: error: break statement not within loop or switch
That seems acceptable to me...
W.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bangerth at dealii dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26747
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26747] bad break/continue is not dectected until the gimplifier
2006-03-18 16:28 [Bug c++/26747] New: break is not dectected until the gimplifier pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-18 16:29 ` [Bug c++/26747] bad break/continue " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-12 1:08 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2006-10-12 1:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-12 1:25 ` bangerth at math dot tamu dot edu
2007-09-24 18:01 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2006-10-12 1:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-12 01:12 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> What exactly is the problem here? I get this as an error message:
>
> g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-4.2-pre/bin/c++ -c x.cc
> x.cc: In function ‘void f()’:
> x.cc:3: error: break statement not within loop or switch
Yes but this semantics anyalsis is done while gimplifing and not while parsing.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-10-12 01:12:23
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26747
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26747] bad break/continue is not dectected until the gimplifier
2006-03-18 16:28 [Bug c++/26747] New: break is not dectected until the gimplifier pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-12 1:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2006-10-12 1:25 ` bangerth at math dot tamu dot edu
2007-09-24 18:01 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at math dot tamu dot edu @ 2006-10-12 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from bangerth at math dot tamu dot edu 2006-10-12 01:25 -------
Subject: Re: bad break/continue is not dectected until the
gimplifier
> Yes but this semantics anyalsis is done while gimplifing and not while parsing.
But I get the message also when using -fsyntax-only...
W.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: bangerth@math.tamu.edu
www: http://www.math.tamu.edu/~bangerth/
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26747
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/26747] bad break/continue is not dectected until the gimplifier
2006-03-18 16:28 [Bug c++/26747] New: break is not dectected until the gimplifier pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2006-10-12 1:25 ` bangerth at math dot tamu dot edu
@ 2007-09-24 18:01 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pcarlini at suse dot de @ 2007-09-24 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-09-24 18:01 -------
Isn't the C++ front-end also fixed? I can confirm that currently the error
comes from cp_parser_jump_statement. In general, the check in build_bc_goto is
apparently dead: I have been able to build and test with gcc_assert (label) in
its place...
--
pcarlini at suse dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pcarlini at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26747
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-24 18:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-18 16:28 [Bug c++/26747] New: break is not dectected until the gimplifier pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-03-18 16:29 ` [Bug c++/26747] bad break/continue " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-12 1:08 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2006-10-12 1:12 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2006-10-12 1:25 ` bangerth at math dot tamu dot edu
2007-09-24 18:01 ` pcarlini at suse dot de
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).