public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug testsuite/31828] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/float-range-[3-5].c (test for excess errors)
@ 2007-05-04 23:08 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-06-06 17:48 ` [Bug testsuite/31828] " sje at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-05-04 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
FAIL: gcc.dg/float-range-3.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/float-range-3.c:10: error: 'FP_INFINITE'
undeclared (first use in this function)
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/float-range-3.c:10: error: (Each
undeclar
ed identifier is reported only once
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/float-range-3.c:10: error: for each
funct
ion it appears in.)
--
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/float-range-[3-5].c (test for excess
errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
GCC host triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
GCC target triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31828
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug testsuite/31828] FAIL: gcc.dg/float-range-[3-5].c (test for excess errors) 2007-05-04 23:08 [Bug testsuite/31828] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/float-range-[3-5].c (test for excess errors) danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-06 17:48 ` sje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-07 17:29 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com ` (4 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: sje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-06 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #1 from sje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-06 17:48 ------- Subject: Bug 31828 Author: sje Date: Wed Jun 6 17:48:03 2007 New Revision: 125496 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=125496 Log: PR testsuite/31828 * inclhack.def (hppa_hpux_fp_macros): New. * fixincl.x: Regenerate. * * tests/base/math.h: Update. Modified: trunk/fixincludes/ChangeLog trunk/fixincludes/fixincl.x trunk/fixincludes/inclhack.def trunk/fixincludes/tests/base/math.h -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31828 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/31828] FAIL: gcc.dg/float-range-[3-5].c (test for excess errors) 2007-05-04 23:08 [Bug testsuite/31828] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/float-range-[3-5].c (test for excess errors) danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-06 17:48 ` [Bug testsuite/31828] " sje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-06-07 17:29 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com 2007-09-28 2:45 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: sje at cup dot hp dot com @ 2007-06-07 17:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #2 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2007-06-07 17:29 ------- This is fixed on HP-UX 11.* systems but is still an issue on HP-UX 10.* systems. -- sje at cup dot hp dot com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sje at cup dot hp dot com GCC build triplet|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa64-hp-hpux10* GCC host triplet|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa64-hp-hpux10* GCC target triplet|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa64-hp-hpux10* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31828 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/31828] FAIL: gcc.dg/float-range-[3-5].c (test for excess errors) 2007-05-04 23:08 [Bug testsuite/31828] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/float-range-[3-5].c (test for excess errors) danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-06 17:48 ` [Bug testsuite/31828] " sje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-07 17:29 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com @ 2007-09-28 2:45 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 3:01 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-28 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 02:45 ------- Is the use of macro FP_INFINITE in these tests a typo? It seems to me that the tests should be using the C99 macro INFINITY. In which case, the tests should be conditional on c99_runtime. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31828 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/31828] FAIL: gcc.dg/float-range-[3-5].c (test for excess errors) 2007-05-04 23:08 [Bug testsuite/31828] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/float-range-[3-5].c (test for excess errors) danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2007-09-28 2:45 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-28 3:01 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-02 2:18 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-02 2:19 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-09-28 3:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #4 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 03:01 ------- On the otherhand, maybe the tests should use __builtin_inff. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31828 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/31828] FAIL: gcc.dg/float-range-[3-5].c (test for excess errors) 2007-05-04 23:08 [Bug testsuite/31828] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/float-range-[3-5].c (test for excess errors) danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2007-09-28 3:01 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-02 2:18 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-02 2:19 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-02 2:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #5 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-02 02:18 ------- Subject: Bug 31828 Author: danglin Date: Tue Oct 2 02:17:50 2007 New Revision: 128947 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=128947 Log: PR testsuite/31828 gcc.dg/float-range-3.c (INFINITY): Define if not defined. (overflow): Use INFINITY, not FP_INFINITE. gcc.dg/float-range-4.c: Likewise. gcc.dg/float-range-5.c: Likewise. Modified: trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/float-range-3.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/float-range-4.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/float-range-5.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31828 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/31828] FAIL: gcc.dg/float-range-[3-5].c (test for excess errors) 2007-05-04 23:08 [Bug testsuite/31828] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/float-range-[3-5].c (test for excess errors) danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2007-10-02 2:18 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-02 2:19 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-02 2:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Comment #6 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-02 02:19 ------- Fixed. -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31828 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-02 2:19 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2007-05-04 23:08 [Bug testsuite/31828] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/float-range-[3-5].c (test for excess errors) danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-06 17:48 ` [Bug testsuite/31828] " sje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-07 17:29 ` sje at cup dot hp dot com 2007-09-28 2:45 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-09-28 3:01 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-02 2:18 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-02 2:19 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).