From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6542 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2007 10:06:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 6501 invoked by uid 48); 1 Oct 2007 10:06:43 -0000 Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 10:06:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071001100643.6500.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libstdc++/33605] Comparable concepts cause errors with abstract types In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "pcarlini at suse dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00021.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #2 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-01 10:06 ------- The most recent boost release (1.34.1) of those checks uses the same code of our adaption. Given that, and given of course that we are finally in the era of real concepts in the core language for the forthcoming new standard, I don't think we should change anything non-trivial in this area: in any case a library-only solution will be always affected by serious problems. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33605