From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24165 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2007 16:36:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 24119 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2007 16:36:45 -0000 Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 16:36:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071003163645.24118.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug fortran/33626] Parentheses get wrong kind during matching In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00227.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #4 from Tobias dot Schlueter at physik dot uni-muenchen dot de 2007-10-03 16:36 ------- Subject: Re: Parentheses get wrong kind during matching fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 16:26 ------- > (In reply to comment #1) >> Created an attachment (id=14291) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14291&action=view) > --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14291&action=view) [edit] >> Putative patch > > I thought about that, because it seems right, but the the question is: what was > the intent of the original situation, which only copied typespec only for > unknown types? I'm thinking that was a case of playing it overly safe as the comment indicates. OTOH I'm seeing a testsuite failure with derived_comp_array_ref_5.f90 for which I have no explanation at the moment, I'll have to doublecheck if it disappears without my patch. > I'll test it. Thanks! - Tobi -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33626