* [Bug c++/11078] [ABI] ICE in write_type with typeof and templates
[not found] <bug-11078-6207@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2005-12-23 15:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-12 13:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-12-23 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #25 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-23 15:52 -------
*** Bug 25544 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11078
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/11078] [ABI] ICE in write_type with typeof and templates
[not found] <bug-11078-6207@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-12-23 15:52 ` [Bug c++/11078] [ABI] ICE in write_type with typeof and templates pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-05-12 13:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-15 1:36 ` blaisorblade_spam at yahoo dot it
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-05-12 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #26 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-05-12 14:44 -------
*** Bug 31905 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |blaisorblade_spam at yahoo
| |dot it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11078
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/11078] [ABI] ICE in write_type with typeof and templates
[not found] <bug-11078-6207@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-12-23 15:52 ` [Bug c++/11078] [ABI] ICE in write_type with typeof and templates pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-05-12 13:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2007-05-15 1:36 ` blaisorblade_spam at yahoo dot it
2007-10-03 23:54 ` [Bug c++/11078] [ABI] decltype(T()) doesn't work jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: blaisorblade_spam at yahoo dot it @ 2007-05-15 1:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #27 from blaisorblade_spam at yahoo dot it 2007-05-15 02:36 -------
What about actually doing as suggested comment #8? I.e. adding a nice error
message rather than an ICE?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11078
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/11078] [ABI] decltype(T()) doesn't work
[not found] <bug-11078-6207@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-05-15 1:36 ` blaisorblade_spam at yahoo dot it
@ 2007-10-03 23:54 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-19 13:45 ` aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-19 17:54 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2007-10-03 23:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #28 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-03 23:54 -------
Changing the testcase to use decltype instead of typeof produces this error
with current sources:
wa.C:2: sorry, unimplemented: zero-operand casts cannot be mangled due to a
defect in the C++ ABI
Now that we have decltype, I think we don't need to worry about mangling
typeof. I'm just going to add a sorry to suggest that people use decltype
instead.
--
jason at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |doug dot gregor at gmail dot
| |com
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |rejects-valid
Summary|[ABI] ICE in write_type with|[ABI] decltype(T()) doesn't
|typeof and templates |work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11078
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/11078] [ABI] decltype(T()) doesn't work
[not found] <bug-11078-6207@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2007-10-03 23:54 ` [Bug c++/11078] [ABI] decltype(T()) doesn't work jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-08-19 13:45 ` aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-19 17:54 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-08-19 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 875 bytes --]
------- Comment #29 from aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-19 13:43 -------
4.3.1 and later give:
GNU C++ (Debian 4.3.1-8) version 4.3.1 (i486-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.3.1, GMP version 4.2.2, MPFR version 2.3.1.
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
Compiler executable checksum: 1a96b3b5ffa5cfd9037de3acec5e6692
known.C: In instantiation of ‘__typeof__ ((T1() + T2())) add(T1, T2) [with T1 =
double, T2 = char]’:
known.C:3: instantiated from here
known.C:2: sorry, unimplemented: mangling typeof, use decltype instead
--
aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |4.3.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11078
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/11078] [ABI] decltype(T()) doesn't work
[not found] <bug-11078-6207@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-08-19 13:45 ` aldot at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-08-19 17:54 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
5 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2008-08-19 17:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #30 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-08-19 17:52 -------
Yes, this can be considered fixed.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11078
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread