public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/33619] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] TER breaks some inline-asm code (again)
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 17:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071005170507.6935.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-33619-6528@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2007-10-05 17:05 -------
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] TER breaks some inline-asm code (again)
On 5 Oct 2007 10:58:10 -0000, jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-05 10:58 -------
> If __builtin_expect is the only problem, then we could certainly allow
> __builtin_expect to be replaceable (perhaps add a few other builtin calls
> that never result in any actual calls, like __builtin_object_size).
well those should be foldded before exand now so i am not worried about them.
--Pinski
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33619
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-05 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-01 21:49 [Bug tree-optimization/33619] New: " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-01 21:49 ` [Bug tree-optimization/33619] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-02 13:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-02 23:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-04 19:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-05 10:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-05 17:05 ` pinskia at gmail dot com [this message]
2007-10-07 20:11 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-09 19:30 ` mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-12 8:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-15 15:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-10-15 18:49 ` [Bug tree-optimization/33619] [4.1/4.2 " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-01 17:00 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-19 20:29 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 22:52 ` [Bug tree-optimization/33619] [4.2 " jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-30 22:29 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071005170507.6935.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).