From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10975 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2007 14:56:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 10933 invoked by uid 48); 8 Oct 2007 14:56:18 -0000 Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 14:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20071008145618.10932.qmail@sourceware.org> X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC References: Subject: [Bug libstdc++/33485] parallel v3: do not use __builtin_alloca, use VLA In-Reply-To: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00665.txt.bz2 ------- Comment #7 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2007-10-08 14:56 ------- I've just found a number of other places where currently a VLA is used and we consequently get a warning with current sources if using the right flags. These are: quicksort.h:68 multiway_mergesort.h:142 Benjamin, as a stopgap would you mind using __builtin_alloca in these places as well? Thanks Wolfgang -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33485